A 53-year-old man had implantation of 2 intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology Inc.) in the left eye. Several days after the lower segment was exchanged, an infiltrate was present at the corneal incision site. This progressed to a lower channel infection followed by diffuse keratitis. Culture from the conjunctiva was positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis, but cultures from the cornea were negative for microorganisms. Later, 2 gas bubbles appeared at the interface. The patient was treated with topical and subconjunctival antibiotics and channel irrigation. The keratitis resolved, leaving a neovascularized opacity at the nasal part of the lower channel.
The ICRS actual depth was less than expected. There was mild variability in segment depth, both between segments and along the same segment. No significant difference was found between the depth of Intacs and Kerarings.
Purpose Evaluation of actual vs intended intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation depth as measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) Methods Prospective study evaluating 30 Intacs segments implanted manually in 19 eyes of 15 patients suffering from keratoconus. Segment depth evaluation was performed using anterior segment OCT. Measurements were performed above and below the segment at 3 points in relation to the incision site. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS software for ANOVA, matched t-test, and GLIMMIX procedure. Results Intacs segment depth was 153-μm shallower than intended (58% vs 80%). Segment layout demonstrated the proximal and distal portions to be 13-μm shallower and 12-μm deeper (on average), respectively. Intacs segment thickness does not influence implantation depth. Intacs segments implanted in the same eye do not share similar implantation depths. Stromal compression is likely to occur. Conclusion Intacs are implanted at a shallower depth than intended. The 'pocketing' stage prior to implantation most likely has a stronger effect on the segment's final implantation depth than does the incisions' depth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.