CINV continues to adversely affect patients' QoL despite antiemetic therapy even after treatment with only moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens, and even in the subgroup of patients who do not experience nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours. On the basis of the FLIE results in this study, nausea had a stronger negative impact on patients' daily lives than vomiting.
BACKGROUNDThe authors determined the incidence of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and emesis (vomiting) (CINV) among patients receiving highly (HEC) or moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy. They also assessed whether physicians and nurses accurately recognized the incidence of acute and delayed CINV in their own practices.METHODSA prospective, observational study of adult patients receiving HEC or MEC for the first time was performed. Before patient enrollment, medical oncologists and oncology nurses estimated the incidence of acute (Day 1) and delayed (Days 2–5) CINV after first administration of HEC and MEC in their own practices. Eligible patients from their practices then completed a 6‐day diary including emetic episodes, nausea assessment, and antiemetic medication use. Observed incidence rates of acute and delayed CINV were compared with physician/nurse predictions.RESULTSTwenty‐four physicians and nurses and 298 eligible patients (67 receiving HEC and 231 receiving MEC) were recruited from 14 oncology practices in 6 countries. Greater than 35% of patients overall experienced acute nausea, whereas 13% experienced acute emesis. Delayed nausea and emesis were observed in 60% and 50% of HEC patients, respectively, and in 52% and 28% of MEC patients, respectively. Delayed symptoms appeared without acute symptoms after HEC (emesis, 38%; nausea, 33%) and MEC (emesis, 19%; nausea, 21%). Physicians and nurses accurately predicted the incidence of acute CINV but underestimated the incidence of delayed nausea and emesis after HEC by 21 and 28 percentage points, respectively, and delayed nausea after MEC by 28 percentage points. Greater than 75% of physicians and nurses underestimated the incidence of delayed CINV after both HEC and MEC.CONCLUSIONSPhysicians and nurses markedly underestimated the incidence of delayed nausea and emesis after both HEC and MEC. Delayed nausea and emesis, which may appear even in the absence of acute nausea and emesis, remain important targets for improved therapeutic intervention. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.
A consecutive group of 259 patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung (ACL) were observed to define risk groups for and frequency of brain metastases together with prognosis. All patients received chemotherapy in a three-armed randomized trial. Brain metastases were diagnosed in 25 patients before protocol entry and in 37 during treatment. Brain autopsy was performed in 87 patients and was positive in 38 (44%). Eleven of these (29%) were not diagnosed clinically. Patients younger than 60 years had a somewhat higher overall frequency of brain metastases than older patients. Patients with initial performance status above 60% and patients responding to chemotherapy had higher risk for developing brain metastasis during treatment than other patients, probably because of the increasing cumulated risk for this complication with prolonged survival. Median survival after onset of brain metastases was 73 days and survival was significantly shorter for these patients than for patients without this complication at days 0, 90, 180, and 365 after protocol entry. Thus, brain metastases is a frequent complication in ACL and the frequency increases with prolonged survival. Survival after development of brain metastases is short and it is questionable whether the inclusion of this subgroup of ACL patients into experimental cytostatic treatments is justified.
Long-term survival can be achieved for both stages of SCLC, but without any change in survival rates over the last decade. Long-term survivors continuously seem to have considerable mortality due to late relapses and secondary malignancies, especially tobacco-related cancers and other tobacco-related diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.