Oncolytic adenoviruses represent a new approach for cancer therapy due to its tumor specificity. E1B 55kDa-deleted adenovirus type 5 (Ad5dlE1B 55kDa) is a promising therapeutic agent that can selectively replicate in and lyse p53 defective cancer cells. However, the overall efficacy has shown varying degrees of success with raised doubts about the correlation between p53 status and E1B-deleted adenovirus replication ability. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the efficiency of Ad5dlE1B 55kDa replication and p53 levels in cancer cells. Five transient p53 expression vectors were engineered to expresses different p53 levels in transfected cells. Then, the effect of the variable p53 levels and cellular backgrounds on the replication efficiency of oncolytic Ad5dlE1B 55kDa was evaluated in H1299 and HeLa cell lines. We found that the replication efficiency of these oncolytic viruses is dependent on the status, but not the expression levels, of p53. Ad5dlE1B 55kDa was shown to have selective replication activity in H1299 cells (p53-null) and decreased viral replication in HeLa cells (p53-positive), relative to the wild-type adenovirus in both cell lines. Our findings suggest that there is a relation between the E1B-deleted adenovirus replication and the presence as well as the activity of p53, independent of its quantity.

The adenovirus major late promoter (MLP) and its translational regulator – the tripartite leader (TPL) sequence – can actively drive efficient gene expression during adenoviral infection. However, both elements have not been widely tested in transgene expression outside of the adenovirus genome context. In this study, we tested whether the combination of MLP and TPL would enhance transgene expression beyond that of the most widely used promoter in transgene expression in mammalian cells, the cytomegalovirus immediate early (CMVie) promoter/enhancer. The activity of these two regulatory elements was compared in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Although transient expression was significantly higher under the control of the CMVie promoter/enhance compared to the MLP/TPL, this difference was greater at the level of transcription (30 folds) than translation (11 folds). Even with adenovirus infection to provide additional elements (in trans), CMVie promoter/enhancer exhibited significantly higher activity relative to MLP/TPL. Interestingly, the CMVie promoter/enhancer was 1.9 folds more active in adenovirus-infected cells than in non-infected cells. Our study shows that the MLP-TPL drives lower transgene expression than the CMVie promoter/enhancer particularly at the transcription level. The data also highlight the utility of the TPL sequence at the translation level and/or possible overwhelming of the cellular translational machinery by the high transcription activity of the CMVie promoter/enhancer. In addition, here we present data that show stimulation of the CMVie promoter/enhancer by adenovirus infection, which may prove interesting in future work to test the combination of CMVie/TPL sequence, and additional adenovirus elements, for transgene expression.