SUMMARYThe most common cause of male infertility is idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia. Empirical medical treatment for idiopathic male infertility is still a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate any possible effects of combining vitamin E as antioxidant and clomiphene citrate as antiestrogen on spermatozoa concentration and motility in comparison to give either of medications alone in patients with idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia. This is a comparative prospective randomized study. Ninety patients with idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia were randomized into equally three groups: Group A: received vitamin E (400 mg/day) for 6 months. Group B: received clomiphene citrate (25 mg daily) for 6 months. Group C: received combination of both drugs in the same doses for 6 months. All patients were subjected to the following: history taking, general and genital examination, semen analysis, serum FSH, total testosterone, and scrotal duplex. Semen examination was performed according to the guidelines of (WHO, 2010), at the start of treatment and was repeated after 3 months and after 6 months of treatment. Regarding vitamin E group, there was insignificant increase in mean sperm concentration after 6 months of treatment in comparison to baseline. On the other hand, there was a significant improvement of mean sperm concentration in the other two groups after 6 months of treatment, with more significance in combination therapy group (p = 0.001). The mean total sperm motility has improved in all patients groups, in comparison to baseline, with more significance in combination therapy group. In vitamin E group, it was 28.07 AE 9.65% (p = 0.000). For those in clomiphene citrate group, was 33.33 AE 14.10% (p = 0.003) and 40.50 AE 17.54% (p = 0.000) in combination therapy group. Combining antioxidant and antiestrogen therapy is a valid option for the treatment of a selected group of men with unexplained isolated oligoasthenozoospermia.

ObjectiveTo assess the safety, efficacy, and stone-free rate (SFR) of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower calyceal stones of ⩽2 cm, and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each.Patients and methodsIn all, 120 patients with lower calyceal stones of ⩽2 cm were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group A were managed by mini-PCNL and Group B by RIRS using flexible ureteroscopy and laser. The mean age, sex, stone size, operating time, complications, hospital stay, and SFR were compared between the groups. The success of the procedure was defined as the absence of residual stones or small residuals of ⩽0.2 cm on computed tomography at 12 weeks postoperatively.ResultsBoth groups were comparable for preoperative parameters. The mean (SD) operating time was statistically significantly longer in Group B [109.66 (20.75) min] as compared to Group A [71.66 (10.36) min]. Although the hospital stay was longer in Group A as compared to Group B this was not statistically significant (P = 0.244). The SFR for Group A was 92.72% and for Group B it was 84.31%, which was not significantly different (P = 0.060).ConclusionFor treating lower calyceal stones of ⩽2 cm mini-PCNL and RIRS are comparable. Mini-PCNL had a better SFR than RIRS but the hospital stay was longer and there were more intraoperative complications, whilst, RIRS had a significantly longer operating time compared with mini-PCNL and a higher incidence of postoperative fever, and a lower SFR.

PCNL with multiple tracts carries a risk of adversely affecting renal function. Preoperative baseline renal impairment, diabetes, and hypertension are risk factors for significant renal function deterioration after the procedure.

No abstract

No abstract