The effect of Ti content in various concentrations as an alloying element with Al on both microhardness and crystallization structure of aluminum–titanium alloys was studied, utilizing x-ray diffraction (XRD) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To study the electrochemical and corrosion performance of Al and its investigated alloys in 0.5 M solutions of HCl and H3PO4, two different techniques were used: extrapolation of Tafel plot and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Tafel plots and EIS revealed a similar trend. Generally, the rate of corrosion of the alloys was higher than that of Al. This investigation exhibited that the corrosion of Al alloying with Ti increased with an increase in both Ti content and temperature, which is due to reducing the growth of oxide film on the surface. Changes in the standard values of both entropy (ΔS) and enthalpy (ΔH), in addition to apparent activation energy (Ea) of corrosion processes of Al and its alloys in HCl and H3PO4, were evaluated. The evaluated data indicated negative values of ΔS, while the values of ΔH were positive. Besides, the decrease in ΔH value with the increase of Ti content in the alloy revealed that the dissolution of the studied alloys was fast. The positive values of ΔH were accompanied by an endothermic process. On the other hand, the activation energy (Ea) was decreased as a result of Al alloying with Ti in the two mentioned acids. Those results were supported by the corrosion current density (icorr.) and impedance parameters. By comparing the data obtained for both HCl and H3PO4 in all investigated electrodes, the corrosion current density (icorr.) in H3PO4 was lower than that in HCl. Such behavior can be ascribed to the aggressive attack of Cl¯ ions on the surfaces of the investigated electrodes, leading to pits formation.

Abstract2-Mercaptobenzothiazole (2-MBT) in a solution of 0.5 M HCl is an effective corrosion inhibitor for aluminum and aluminum–titanium alloys. Tafel polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were employed to assess this heterocyclic compound’s anticorrosive potential and complementary by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and calculating porosity percentage in the absence and presence of various inhibitor concentrations. Inhibition efficiency (IE%) was strongly related to concentration (10–6–10–3 M). Temperature’s effect on corrosion behavior was investigated. The data exhibited that the IE% decreases as the temperature increases. An increase in activation energy (Ea) with increasing the inhibitor concentration and the decrease in the IE% value of the mentioned compound with raising the temperature indicates that the inhibitor molecules are adsorbed physically on the surface. Thermodynamic activation parameters for Al and Al–Ti alloy dissolution in both 0.5 M HCl and the inhibited solution were calculated and discussed. According to Langmuir’s adsorption isotherm, the inhibitor molecules were adsorbed. The evaluated standard values of the enthalpy ($$\Delta {H}_{ads.}^{o})$$ Δ H a d s . o ) , entropy ($$\Delta {S}_{ads.}^{o})$$ Δ S a d s . o ) and free energy changes ($$\Delta {G}_{ads.}^{o})$$ Δ G a d s . o ) showed that $$\Delta {H}_{ads.}^{o}$$ Δ H a d s . o and $$\Delta {G}_{ads.}^{o}$$ Δ G a d s . o are negative, while $$\Delta {S}_{ads.}^{o}$$ Δ S a d s . o was positive. The formation of a protective layer adsorbed on the surfaces of the substrates was confirmed with the surface analysis (SEM). The porosity percentage is significantly reduced in the inhibitor presence and gradually decreased with increasing concentration. Furthermore, the density functional theory (DFT) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were employed to explain the variance in protecting the Al surface from corrosion. Interestingly, the theoretical findings align with their experimental counterparts. The planarity of 2-MBT and the presence of heteroatoms are the playmakers in the adsorption process.