Objectives: Nasal saline irrigation is the corner stone of postoperative care after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, intrasinus penetration of the saline solution can be challenging and may require difficult head position, particularly for the frontal sinus. Our aim was to evaluate a novel device for direct intrasinus self-irrigation, usable at home for both maxillary and frontal sinus. Methods: Thirty devices were implemented in 23 patients: in the maxillary sinus for 18 patients and in the frontal sinus for 5 patients. The device was removed after 7 days on average (5-10 days), and nasal saline irrigation was carried on with a squeeze bottle for 6 weeks. Retrospective evaluation of the device included: device-related complication, patient satisfaction, and ostial or middle turbinate synechiae at 3 months. Results: No device-related complication (obstruction, displacement, infection, bleeding) occurred. Twenty-one (91.3%) patients were satisfied with the device. Two patients required the help of a nurse for irrigation. No ostial of middle turbinate synechiae was visualized at 3 months. This new endonasal device enables direct intrasinus self-irrigation after FESS for CRS. Conclusion: This preliminary study showed that this device is safe and easy to use. However, further investigations are required to assess its potential role to reduce the risk of synechiae and revision surgery.

Objective Pyriform aperture enlargement or “pyriplasty” is an uncommonly used procedure for internal nasal valve obstruction in adults besides functional rhinoplasty, inferior turbinate reduction, and septoplasty. A systematic review of the literature was performed to analyze current surgical techniques, their suggested indications, and their related outcome in terms of success and complications. Data Sources The search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases. Review Methods The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies on congenital, traumatic, tumoral, or infectious internal nasal valve obstruction were excluded. Results Eight articles were finally included. Three types of pyriplasty have been described according to the level of bone resection: low-level pyriplasty through the sublabial approach, mid-level pyriplasty through endonasal approach, and extended pyriplasty through either approach. Indications included (1) clinically or radiologically narrow pyriform aperture, (2) previously unsuccessful internal nasal valve surgery, (3) lateral nasal wall collapse, and (4) inferior turbinate’s head hypertrophy. Subjective improvement of nasal obstruction was reported in these 4 indications. No major complication was encountered. Conclusion Pyriplasty for nasal obstruction is a simple and safe procedure that could be effective in selected cases. However, level of evidence is currently low, and success rate may vary with indications and pyriplasty techniques. Moreover, there is no clear definition of normal pyriform aperture dimensions to date. Further prospective studies are thereby necessary and should include radiological analysis of pyriform aperture and validated nasal obstruction measurement tools.