Peripartum hysterectomy is a dramatic with high risk but a life saving operation. It is usually associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Obstetricians should identify patients at risk and anticipate the procedure and complications, as early intervention and proper management facilitate optimal outcome.

Objective: Our purpose was to determine the relationship between previous caesarean section and subsequent development of placenta praevia and placenta praevia with accreta. Method: A retrospective review of the case records of all women delivered with the diagnosis of placenta praevia during the 2-year period from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996, at the tertiary referral centre, Princess Badeea Teaching Hospital, in north Jordan. Results: There were 18,651 deliveries in the study period. 65 (0.35%) had placenta praevia, 21 (32.3%) of whom had a history of previous caesarean section. The incidence of placenta praevia was significantly increased in those with a previous caesarean section (1.87%) compared with those with an unscarred uterus (0.25%); p < 0.0001). This risk increased as the number of previous caesarean sections increased: 1.78% for one previous section; 2.4% for two, and 2.8% for three or more. The incidence of anterior placenta praevia and placenta accreta was significantly increased in those with previous caesarean scars. In the group without antecedent of caesarean section, accretism risk was 9%, with one section or more 40.8% (p < 0.005). Conclusion: There is a high association between anterior placenta praevia, placenta accreta and previous caesarean section. This was enhanced with the increasing number of previous caesarean sections. Patients with an antepartum diagnosis of placenta praevia who have had a previous caesarean section should be considered at high risk of developing placenta praevia and accreta.

Umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) is an obstetric emergency. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of cord prolapse, its aetiological factors and to evaluate fetal prognosis. This was a retrospective review of cord prolapse deliveries in the main two civil hospitals in North Jordan between 1995 and 2005, at Princess Badeea Hospital and at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in Irbid, North Jordan. There were 146 patients identified with UCP among a total of 64,192 consecutive births. The incidence of cord prolapse was one in 440 cases (146/64,192). It occurred mostly in women over 25 years, and significantly more in pre-term births, low birth weight babies, multigravida, and only a few were associated with induced cases. It was not associated with higher rates of perinatal mortality and this supports the benefit of clinical management of UCP by emergency (crash) delivery.

Objective: The purpose of our study was to identify the risk factors of uterine rupture during labour, to report maternal and neonatal outcome, and to propose preventive measures. Study Design: A retrospective study with review of patients’ files and monitor strips was performed. Results: Between January 1, 1994 and November 30, 1998, there were 21 cases of uterine rupture at our institution. Of these, 6 patients had complete rupture, and 15 had incomplete rupture. The risk of uterine rupture was increased in patients who had a history of one or more Caesarean sections, obstructed labour, dysfunctional labour, and those who had injudicious use of uterine stimulants. There was no maternal death and fetal loss was 7 (33.3%). Conclusions: The high incidence of uterine rupture is attributed to lack of prenatal care, labour in high-risk patients outside hospital because of declining economy, and more patients with two or more previously scarred uterus. The maternal and neonatal complications have remained very high in the developing countries. We recommend that all patients with a history of Caesarean delivery should be delivered in hospital and observed closely for progression of labour, recognition of an active phase arrest requires operative delivery.