Background: The prolonged treatment duration for multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) makes dosing linezolid difficult because of adverse effects associated with long-term use. We sought to find the optimal dosing regimen for linezolid given different MIC values. Methods: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from TB patients were included from Brazil, Georgia, and two U.S. sites. Population PK modeling and simulation were performed. We used fAUC/MIC >119 as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target, and Cmin of 2 and 7 mg/L as thresholds for toxicity. The PK/PD breakpoint was defined as the highest MIC at which the probability of target attainment is >90%. Results: A total of 104 patients with pulmonary TB were included, with a median age and weight of 37 years and 60 kilograms. 81% had drug-resistant TB. The PK data were best described by a one-compartment model. The PK/PD breakpoint was 0.125 mg/L for a total daily dose of 300 mg, while the daily dose of 450-600 mg and 900-1200 mg had PK/PD breakpoints of 0.25 and 0.50 mg/L, respectively. The probability of achieving Cmin ≤2 mg/L was higher when the dose was given at once versus dividing it to two doses. Conclusion: Linezolid daily dose of 300 mg may not be optimal. We predicted excellent and comparable efficacy of linezolid using total daily doses of 900 and 1200 mg for MICs ≤0.5 mg/L, but with a potential for more toxicity compared to 600 mg daily. The increase in Cmin was noticeable when the daily dose was divided and may incur greater toxicity.

Background In the ICU, early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is important to lower infection-related mortality. Objectives Assess whether achieving early β-lactam free concentration above the MIC 100% of the time (fT>MIC) is associated with positive outcomes in the ICU. Methods This retrospective study was conducted in ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital between 2016 and 2018. Adult patients who received β-lactam therapy and had drug concentration measured were included. Data collected included demographics, β-lactam regimens and concentrations, sources of infection, cultures and susceptibilities, mortality, length of stay, resistance acquisition for 30 days and clinical outcome at end of therapy. Multiple regression and time-to-event (TTE) analyses were performed. Results Two-hundred and six patients were included. Clinical cure occurred in 71%, microbial eradication occurred in 58% and new resistance to the β-lactam received developed in 8% of patients. Hospital and 30 day mortalities were 17% and 14%, respectively. fT>MIC and fT>4×MIC were associated with clinical cure (P = 0.0303), microbial eradication (P = 0.0476) and suppression of resistance (P = 0.0043). Delay in measuring β-lactam concentration was associated with clinical failure (P = 0.0072), longer ICU stay (P < 0.0001) and higher mortality (P = 0.0387). In the TTE analysis, patients with 100% fT>MIC had a significantly shorter ICU stay (P = 0.0297). Patients who had clinical cure and microbial eradication had drug concentrations measured earlier (P = 0.0025 and 0.0254, respectively). Conclusions This study highlights the importance of early measurement of β-lactam concentration and confirms the association between fT>MIC and clinical cure, microbial eradication and emergence of resistance.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), tuberculosis is the leading cause of death attributed to a single microbial pathogen worldwide. In addition to the large number of patients affected by tuberculosis, the emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug-resistance is complicating tuberculosis control in many high-burden countries. During the past 5 years, the global number of patients identified with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), defined as bacillary resistance at least against rifampicin and isoniazid, the two most active drugs in a treatment regimen, has increased by more than 20% annually. Today we experience a historical peak in the number of patients affected by MDR-TB. The management of MDR-TB is characterized by delayed diagnosis, uncertainty of the extent of bacillary drug-resistance, imprecise standardized drug regimens and dosages, very long duration of therapy and high frequency of adverse events which all translate into a poor prognosis for many of the affected patients. Major scientific and technological advances in recent years provide new perspectives through treatment regimens tailor-made to individual needs. Where available, such personalized treatment has major implications on the treatment outcomes of patients with MDR-TB. The challenge now is to bring these adances to those patients that need them most.

One-third of the world's population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb.). Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can progress to tuberculosis disease, the leading cause of death by infection. Rifamycin antibiotics, like rifampin and rifapentine, have unique sterilizing activity against M.tb. What are the advantages of each for LTBI or tuberculosis treatment? Areas covered: We review studies assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), drug interaction risk, safety, and efficacy of rifampin and rifapentine and provide basis for comparing them. Expert commentary: Rifampin has shorter half-life, higher MIC against M.tb, lower protein binding, and better distribution into cavitary contents than rifapentine. Drug interactions for the two drugs maybe similar in magnitude. For LTBI, rifapentine is effective as convenient, once-weekly, 12-week course of treatment. Rifampin is also effective for LTBI, but must be given daily for four months, therefore, drug interactions are more problematic. For drug-sensitive tuberculosis disease, rifampin remains the standard of care. Safety profile of rifampin is better-described; adverse events differ somewhat for the two drugs. The registered once-weekly rifapentine regimen is inadequate, but higher doses of either drugs may shorten the treatment duration required for effective management of TB. Results of clinical trials evaluating high-dose rifamycin regimens are eagerly awaited.