Gastric cancer is the fourth cause of cancer death globally, and gastric adenocarcinoma is its most common type. Efforts for the treatment of gastric cancer have increased its median survival rate by only seven months. Due to the relatively low response of gastric cancer to surgery and adjuvant therapy, as well as the complex role of risk factors in its incidences, such as protein-pomp inhibitors (PPIs) and viral and bacterial infections, we aimed to study the pathological pathways involved in gastric cancer development and investigate possible medications by systems biology and bioinformatics tools. In this study, the protein–protein interaction network was analyzed based on microarray data, and possible effective compounds were discovered. Non-coding RNA versus coding RNA interaction network and gene-disease network were also reconstructed to better understand the underlying mechanisms. It was found that compounds such as amiloride, imatinib, omeprazole, troglitazone, pantoprazole, and fostamatinib might be effective in gastric cancer treatment. In a gene-disease network, it was indicated that diseases such as liver carcinoma, breast carcinoma, liver fibrosis, prostate cancer, ovarian carcinoma, and lung cancer were correlated with gastric adenocarcinoma through specific genes, including hgf, mt2a, mmp2, fbn1, col1a1, and col1a2. It was shown that signaling pathways such as cell cycle, cell division, and extracellular matrix organization were overexpressed, while digestion and ion transport pathways were underexpressed. Based on a multilevel systems biology analysis, hub genes in gastric adenocarcinoma showed participation in the pathways such as focal adhesion, platelet activation, gastric acid secretion, HPV infection, and cell cycle. PPIs are hypothesized to have a therapeutic effect on patients with gastric cancer. Fostamatinib seems a potential therapeutic drug in gastric cancer due to its inhibitory effect on two survival genes. However, these findings should be confirmed through experimental investigations.

No abstract

Introduction: Healthcare policies and clinical decisions heavily rely on research publications from high-impact medical journals. A lack of author diversity in medical publications poses a risk to underrepresented groups. To promote equity in healthcare medical decisions, fostering collaborations within research groups is crucial. This study integrates scientometrics with network analysis to uncover intricate co-authorship networks and examine diversity and inclusion in scientific collaboration. Methods: The authors' metadata from five high-impact medical journals were collected, and a weighted graph of co-authorships was constructed. The study addresses four research questions: identifying influential authors, exploring research output communities, analyzing collaboration patterns, and examining the evolution of collaboration over time. Results: Central nodes are significantly more likely to be male or from high-income countries. Further, when evaluated over time, the graph reveals concerning trends in diversity where collaboration with authors from lower income countries is not growing. All code is publicly available on GitHub. Discussion: The findings underscore the need to promote diversity within research niches and question the role of gatekeepers in facilitating inclusivity. Future studies should expand the scope of network analysis and explore additional factors such as funding sources and guidelines. Conclusion: Overall, this study contributes a framework for auditing diversity and inclusion in scientific collaboration, aiming to promote transparency and a more equitable medical knowledge production system.

Objective:We aimed to explore the underlying pathomechanisms of the comorbidity between three common systemic autoimmune disorders (SADs) [i.e., insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)] and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), using bioinformatics tools. We hypothesized that there are shared genetic variations among these four conditions. Methods: Different databases (DisGeNET, Harmonizome, and Enrichr) were searched to find TLE-associated genes with variants; their single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were gathered from the literature. We also did a separate literature search using PubMed with the following keywords for original articles: "TLE" or "Temporal lobe epilepsy" AND "genetic variation," "single nucleotide polymorphism," "SNP," or "genetic polymorphism." In the next step, the SNPs associated with TLE were searched in the LitVar database to find the shared gene variations with RA, SLE, and IDDM.Results: Ninety unique SNPs were identified to be associated with TLE. LitVar search identified two SNPs that were shared between TLE and all three SADs (i.e., IDDM, SLE, and RA). The first SNP was rs16944 on the Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) gene. The second genetic variation was ε4 variation of apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene.Significance: The shared genetic variations (i.e., rs16944 on the IL-1β gene and ε4 variation of the APOE gene) may explain the underlying pathomechanisms of the comorbidity between three common SADs (i.e., IDDM, SLE, and RA) and TLE. Exploring such shared genetic variations may help find targeted therapies for patients with TLE, especially those with drug-resistant seizures who also have comorbid SADs.

No abstract