The analytical hierarchical process/data envelopment analysis (AHP/DEA) methodology for ranking decision‐making units (DMUs) has some problems: it illogically compares two DMUs in a DEA model; it is not compatible with DEA ranking in the case of multiple inputs/multiple outputs; and it leads to weak discrimination in cases where the number of inputs and outputs is large. In this paper, we propose a new two‐stage AHP/DEA methodology for ranking DMUs that removes these problems. In the first stage, we create a pairwise comparison matrix different from AHP/DEA methodology; the second stage is the same as AHP/DEA methodology. Numerical examples are presented in the paper to illustrate the advantages of the new AHP/DEA methodology.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) models assume real-valued inputs and outputs, but on many occasions, some inputs and/or outputs can only take integer values. In these cases, using DEA models can result in misleading efficiency assessments and inaccurate performance targets. In this paper, we propose an enumeration algorithm for computing efficiency scores and performance targets of decision-making units with integer value inputs/outputs. In the presented algorithm, we do not use any of the mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models that are used in previous studies. We show that the result of our algorithm and that of the MILP model presented in this context is the same. We also generalize our algorithm for different types of returns to scale as well as for the hybrid setting with real-valued data.
If production trade-offs-which represent simultaneously feasible exchanges in the inputs and outputs of decision-making units (DMUs)-are added to an integer production possibility set (IPPS), a new IPPS is produced; conventional axioms of production do not generate a new IPPS, however. This paper develops the axiomatic foundation for data envelopment analysis (DEA) for integer-value inputs and outputs in the presence of production trade-offs by introducing a new axiom of "natural trade-offs." First, a mixed-integer linear programming formula called an integer DEA trade-off (IDEA-TO) is presented for computing efficiency scores and reference points. The numeration algorithm (NA) method presented in this concept is improved, and an improved numeration algorithm (INA) method for solving integer DEA (IDEA) models is developed. Finally, comparison between the two methods and a generalized INA method for solving the IDEA-TO model are presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.