Background
Cellular transplantations have promising effects on treating spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and Schwann cells (SCs), which have safety alongside their complementary characteristics, are suggested to be the two of the best candidates in SCI treatment. In this study, we assessed the safety and possible outcomes of intrathecal co-transplantation of autologous bone marrow MSC and SC in patients with subacute traumatic complete SCI.
Methods
Eleven patients with complete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS); grade A) were enrolled in this study during the subacute period of injury. The patients received an intrathecal autologous combination of MSC and SC and were followed up for 12 months. We assessed the neurological changes by the American Spinal Injury Association’s (ASIA) sensory-motor scale, functional recovery by spinal cord independence measure (SCIM-III), and subjective changes along with adverse events (AE) with our checklist. Furthermore, electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and urodynamic study (UDS) were conducted for all the patients at the baseline, 6 months, and 1 year after the intervention.
Results
Light touch AIS score alterations were approximately the same as the pinprick changes (11.6 ± 13.1 and 12 ± 13, respectively) in 50% of the cervical and 63% of the lumbar-thoracic patients, and both were more than the motor score alterations (9.5 ± 3.3 in 75% of the cervical and 14% of the lumbar-thoracic patients). SCIM III total scores (21.2 ± 13.3) and all its sub-scores (“respiration and sphincter management” (15 ± 9.9), “mobility” (9.5 ± 13.3), and “self-care” (6 ± 1.4)) had statistically significant changes after cell injection. Our findings support that the most remarkable positive, subjective improvements were in trunk movement, equilibrium in standing/sitting position, the sensation of the bladder and rectal filling, and the ability of voluntary voiding. Our safety evaluation revealed no systemic complications, and radiological images showed no neoplastic overgrowth, syringomyelia, or pseudo-meningocele.
Conclusion
The present study showed that autologous SC and bone marrow-derived MSC transplantation at the subacute stage of SCI could reveal statistically significant improvement in sensory and neurological functions among the patients. It appears that using this combination of cells is safe and effective for clinical application to spinal cord regeneration during the subacute period.
Cell-based therapies are considered as promising strategies for spinal cord regeneration. However, a combinatorial cell therapeutic approach seems more bene cial as it can target various aspects of the injury. Here, we assessed the safety and feasibility of autologous mucosal Olfactory Ensheathing Cell (OEC) and bone marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) co-transplantation in patients with chronic, complete (American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classi cation A) Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Three patients with the traumatic SCI of the thoracic level were enrolled. They received autologous OEC and MSC combination through the lumbar puncture. All adverse events and possible functional outcomes were documented performing pre-and post-operative general clinical examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), neurological assessment based on the International Standard of Neurological Classi cation for SCI (ISNCSCI), and functional evaluation using Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III). No serious safety issue was recorded during the two years of follow-up. MRI ndings remained unchanged with no neoplastic tissue formation. ASIA impairment scale improved from A to B in one of the participants. SCIM III evaluation also showed some degrees of progress in this patient's quality of life. The two other patients had negligible or no improvement in their sensory scores without any changes in the ASIA impairment scale and SCIM III scores. No motor recovery was observed in any of the participants.Overall, this two-year trial was not associated with any adverse ndings, which may suggest the safety of autologous OEC and bone marrow MSC combination for the treatment of human SCI.
Cell-based therapies are considered as promising strategies for spinal cord regeneration. However, a combinatorial cell therapeutic approach seems more beneficial as it can target various aspects of the injury. Here, we assessed the safety and feasibility of autologous mucosal Olfactory Ensheathing Cell (OEC) and bone marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) co-transplantation in patients with chronic, complete (American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification A) Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Three patients with the traumatic SCI of the thoracic level were enrolled. They received autologous OEC and MSC combination through the lumbar puncture. All adverse events and possible functional outcomes were documented performing pre- and post-operative general clinical examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), neurological assessment based on the International Standard of Neurological Classification for SCI (ISNCSCI), and functional evaluation using Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III). No serious safety issue was recorded during the two years of follow-up. MRI findings remained unchanged with no neoplastic tissue formation. ASIA impairment scale improved from A to B in one of the participants. SCIM III evaluation also showed some degrees of progress in this patient's quality of life. The two other patients had negligible or no improvement in their sensory scores without any changes in the ASIA impairment scale and SCIM III scores. No motor recovery was observed in any of the participants. Overall, this two-year trial was not associated with any adverse findings, which may suggest the safety of autologous OEC and bone marrow MSC combination for the treatment of human SCI.This study was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT registration number: IRCT20160110025930N2/ registration date: 2018-09-29).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.