Background: Several neonatal chest conditions require Invasive mechanical ventilation, which is lifesaving for the critically ill neonates. Limiting the duration of airway intubation and mechanical ventilator support is crucial. Weaning from mechanical ventilation induces significant changes in lung aeration which can be easily detected by lung sonography. Aim of the Work:Is to identify the role of pulmonary sonography in evaluation of the artificially ventilated neonates. Patients and Methods:The study included 40 neonates suffering from peripheral diseases requiring mechanical ventilation. All patients had chest ultrasound studies after clinical assessment. Chest ultrasound was performed during the different modes of mechanical ventilation including Assisted Controlled Ventilation (AC), Synchronized Intermittent Mechanical Ventilation (SIMV) and before extubation, follow-up the patients for 48 hours postextubation to assess if its failure occurred. Lung ultrasound was done using a standardized evaluation of lung aeration, i.e. Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS). Other traditional investigations including blood gases and chest X-ray were performed as well.Results: LUS was significantly higher in the 10 patients with post extubation failure. A cut off value of LUS of >13 was highly sensitive and specific for failure of switching from AC to SIMV mode and >6 prior to extubation was indicative of post extubation failure. Conclusion:Chest ultrasound provides a rapid, non invasive, objective and reliable tool for guiding the mechanical ventilation weaning process in neonates through the LUS with high confidence even when compared to other traditional indices as blood gases and respiratory mechanics. A cut off value of LUS of >13 was highly sensitive and specific for failure of switching from AC to SIMV mode and >6 prior to extubation was indicative of post extubation failure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.