Background: Meningomyelocele reconstruction is a lifesaving procedure. A freestyle propeller perforator flap is an ideal option for moderate to large soft tissue meningomyelocele reconstruction. Previous studies that focused on the reliability of perforator flaps for meningomyelocele reconstruction recommended preserving a cuff of soft tissue around the perforators to avoid vasospasm. This method is a very conservative approach in comparison to the recently well-established principles of pedicled perforator flap dissection. In this study, we used a dissection ladder approach. In this method, the pedicle is freed by just islanding the pedicle, skeletonization of the perforator, or further dissection of the perforators beyond the muscles, based on intraoperatively monitoring of the flap. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six infants with a mean age of 2.1 ± 1.1 months underwent surgery for dorsolumbar meningomyelocele at Assuit University Hospital for 3 years. During surgery, the freestyle perforator flap followed a dissection ladder for perforating vessels and intraoperative flap monitoring. Flap viability, seroma, hematoma, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were evaluated. Results: Nine cases required perforator skeletonization, 4 cases required dissection beyond the muscle, and 23 cases required islanding the flap on the perforators. The average operative time was 43.37 ± 7.87 minutes. Partial tip ischemia was detected in 2 cases. These cases exhibited partial dehiscence and healed by secondary intention. Complete flap loss did not occur in any cases. Conclusions: A conservative approach for perforator flap elevation in infants did not provide optimal results in all cases of thoracolumbar meningomyelocele reconstructions. Well-established principles of perforator dissection, including skeletonization and dissection beyond the muscle, are safe, prevent vasospasms, and improve flap viability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.