Importance Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a newly recognised eating disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition and in the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision which shows great heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. Objectives Here, we examined the clinical characteristics of ARFID and explored the associations between ARFID symptoms and traits of anxiety. We also investigated whether individuals with ARFID show a different clinical presentation based on their biological sex or comorbid autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants We recruited 261 consecutive patients from the specialised ARFID outpatient service at the Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, Michael Rutter Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Main Outcomes and Measures The parents of the patients completed the Pica, ARFID, Rumination Disorder - ARFID - Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) and reported biological sex of their offspring. Age, height, and weight were obtained from medical records. Clinicians reported on comorbid ASD diagnosis and anxiety traits using the Current View Tool. Results This cross-sectional study included 261 child and adolescent ARFID patients (133 [51%] female) with a median age of 12.7 years (IQR=9.2 to 15.8). Patients' BMI-for-age z-scores ranged from -6.75 to 4.07 (median = -1.07, IQR = -2.25 to -0.01). Patients' comorbid traits of anxiety had the highest correlations with symptoms on the concern about aversive consequences driver of ARFID: panic disorder correlated with physical feelings of panic and anxiety when eating (r=0.53, p=7.74 x 10-31) and being afraid to eat (r=0.42, p=5.13 x 10-21); generalised anxiety correlated with physical feelings of panic and anxiety when eating (r=0.44, p=7.72 x 10-23); and separation anxiety correlated with avoiding eating situations (r=0.36, p=2.01 x 10-15). Sensory sensitivity to the appearance of food positively correlated with separation anxiety (r=0.40, p=1.52 x 10-16) and generalised anxiety (r=0.36, p=7.16 x 10-18). The sensory sensitivities (RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.09; P = .53), lack of interest (RR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.28; P = .02) and concern about aversive consequences (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.56; P = .03) drivers were independent of patient sex. Comorbid ASD was reported in 74 (28%) ARFID patients. Their parents reported higher rates of food-related sensory sensitivities (RR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.45; P=0.002) and lack of interest (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.34; P=0.006) driving their child's avoidant and restrictive eating than parents of ARFID patients without ASD (127 [49%]). Conclusions and Relevance Our study highlights that ARFID patients present with varying combinations and severity of food-related sensory sensitivities, lack of interest and concern about aversive consequences which drive their avoidant and restrictive eating. ARFID does not discriminate between male and female children and adolescents or those with or without ASD. Anxiety and ASD can co-occur with ARFID, and ASD may accentuate food-related sensory sensitivities and lack of interest. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the multi-faceted and heterogenous nature of ARFID; it is important that comprehensive multidisciplinary assessments are administered to sufficiently understand the drivers of the eating behaviour and associated physical health, nutritional, and psycho-social risk and impact.

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is a condition characterised by a disturbance in eating behaviour that leads to a significant negative impact on physical, social and nutritional health. The diagnosis of ARFID relies on a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary assessment to understand the individual’s history, physical, social and mental health risk, and any co-occurring mental health difficulties. Consensus guidance suggests that psychological treatment, alongside medical and dietetic input is delivered with consideration of any appropriate adaptions to accommodate developmental stage and/or common co-occurring presentations. This paper has been authored by clinicians working in an out-patient setting for children and adolescents with ARFID, and focuses on the presentation and assessment of ARFID and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches that can help children, young people and their families. After an introductory section, the paper is split into four sections: assessment of ARFID; drivers of avoidant restrictive eating behaviour; multi-disciplinary formulation and intervention planning; and treatment. The treatment section provides an overview of the available research on CBT for ARFID, and a brief summary of the broader evidence base for CBT in children and young people with anxiety. Following a review of the evidence base, three case descriptions are provided to illustrate the clinical application of CBT where fear-based avoidance is the main driver. The paper concludes with practice points for clinicians to take forward when working with children and young people with ARFID. Key learning aims (1) To be aware of the international consensus for the use of psychological interventions as a component of ARFID treatment alongside medical and dietetic input. (2) To understand that ARFID is characterised as a disturbance of eating behaviour, and as such, psychological intervention should target the drivers of this disturbance to promote behavioural change. (3) To gain an overview of the multi-disciplinary team assessment as an important tool to understand the contribution of each of the three drivers proposed to underpin an ARFID presentation. (4) To recognise when a CBT approach might be indicated, the current best evidence base for CBT for ARFID and how to adapt CBT to accommodate developmental stage and/or common co-occurring presentations.

Perceived discrimination, a subjective appraisal of disadvantageous treatment on the grounds of identity, is negatively associated with wellbeing. We explored this association among British Muslim students, sampled online, by questions about perceived and experienced discrimination, visibility as a Muslim, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and positivity. Results from 457 respondents showed greater discrimination was experienced by those with more visible signs of Muslim faith, with a small but statistically significant positive correlation between perceived discrimination and psychological distress. Many participants also gave examples of of discrimination experienced. Implications for educational institutes, policy makers, clinicians, and the wider Muslim community are discussed.