Hypopharyngeal carcinoma is usually present at late stages, necessitating an aggressive line of management consisting of surgical procedures, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, depending on the case. Practitioners tend to support total laryngectomies or total esophagostomies for most cases of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The extensive procedures needed will most probably require, depending on the residual defect, a follow-up reconstructive procedure that might require utilizing flaps. Types of reconstructive methods and types of grafts or flaps used could be divided into a multitude of categories depending on the magnitude, shape, extension, and whether the underlying defect that is being reconstructed is circumferential or not. These reconstructive procedures are aimed at improving the quality of life, improving the aesthetic outcome, and restoring the functionality of the pharyngoesophageal segment. When it comes to hypopharyngeal cancer, the most common kind is squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which has the worst prognosis of all the head and neck malignancies. Overall, the 5-year survival rate remains low, despite recent advancements in diagnostic imaging, radiation, and chemotherapy, as well as enhanced surgical methods and techniques. Hypopharyngeal malignancies are more probable than other tumors to present with advanced primary illness, with nodal metastasis a distinct possibility. The size and amount of local dissemination of the original carcinoma, as well as the extent of involvement of regional lymph nodes, are the most critical factors in predicting prognosis. Hypopharyngeal cancers are more likely than other head and neck cancers to manifest with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. The appearance of second primary tumors, as well as the development of distant metastases, is a contributing factor to poor survival rate. Imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast remain the gold standard for evaluating hypopharyngeal carcinoma in the early stages. In most cases, imaging leads to an increase in the tumor stage at the time of presentation. Objectives. The main objectives are to review the research published about flaps, outline the optimum situations that will dictate the usage of a few of the most often used flaps for the rebuilding of the hypopharyngeal segment defects, and outline some of the complications associated with reconstruction. Methods. The processing was carried out with the title-specific search of the PubMed database using the query terms “hypopharyngeal carcinoma” and “reconstruction” to identify the most relevant articles without restricting publication dates. Information about the types of defects and methods of reconstruction was extracted from the reviewed articles. Two books were also reviewed, which were Regional and Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction (second edition) and Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Defect-Oriented Approach. Conclusion. Deciding the appropriate approach to a case should be individualized and should depend on the capabilities of the center, the defect’s size and status, and lastly, the surgeon’s training. The use of interpretation in the diagnosis of flaps can offer the best results in restoring functionality and vascularity and might also offer improved cosmesis.

Background. The parapharyngeal space is a hypothetical region in the neck that stretches from the base of the skull to the bigger corner of the hyoid bone. The fascia that connects the styloid process to the tensor veli palatini separates the compartment into prestyloid and poststyloid compartments, with the prestyloid compartment being larger. In the general population, tumors of the parapharyngeal area are very uncommon, accounting for less than 1% of all head and neck neoplasms in the population. In this location, CT scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams are complimentary, and both tests should be performed to examine any lesions found. The most critical component of treatment is the total surgical removal of all the cancerous tissue. Identifying and treating primary parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors are among the most challenging tasks in the treatment of head and neck cancer. They are also among the most aggressive ones. The primary goal of this study is to review our current knowledge at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, which serves as an academic tertiary referral center and a major teaching center. We will focus on clinical findings, tumor structure, tumor histological distribution, and surgical approaches. Materials and Methods. The processing starts with two modules. The first module starts with the input images obtained from various patients and collected as a database. The second module starts with the collection of case series of nine patients undergoing excision via multiple different approaches: transoral, transcervical, transparotid, transmandibular, or infratemporal approach. All cases were conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 2014 and 2018. All operative interventions were performed by an otolaryngology-head and neck surgeon. Results. Our study comprised nine patients, of which two underwent transparotid and seven transcervical and combined transcervical/transparotid approach. Complications faced included a hematoma in one of our cases. Conclusion. The transcervical approach appeared to be the superior surgical approach when facing a pleomorphic adenoma within the parapharyngeal space, arising from the deep lobe of the parotid gland or parapharyngeal space-occupying paraganglioma.

No abstract