Background: Liver donation is a respectable human gift. It is essential that complications should be minimized as much as possible and must be safely performed.
Aim of the work:To evaluate feasibility and safety of using CUSA for liver resection in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in comparison with harmonic scalpel.
Patients and methods:This prospective study included 40 consecutive donors for LDLT held at Nasser Institute and Air Force Specialized Hospital during the period from September 2017 to September 2018.Results: Harmonic scalpel significantly reduced operative time (p=0.000) with a reduced blood loss (p=0.016), however it caused higher rate of biliary leakage (40% vs 15% respectively). On the other hand, CUSA showed lower bile leak leading to shorter hospital stay (p=0.000).
Conclusion:Although harmonic scalpel is a faster method, CUSA is more effective and safer with a lower complication rate despite being cumbersome and need a longer learning curve.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.