No abstract

The AVIDA registry evaluated azacitidine usage and effectiveness in unselected patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in community practice. Treating physicians made all treatment decisions. Hematologic improvement (HI) and transfusion independence (TI) assessments used International Working Group (IWG) 2000 criteria. Enrolled were 421 patients with MDS (n = 228 International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] lower-risk, n = 106 higher-risk, 86 patients unclassified) from 105 US sites. Median follow-up was 7.6 months (range: 0.1-27.6). HI and red blood cell TI rates were similar regardless of administration route or dosing schedule. Safety and tolerability were consistent with previous reports. The AVIDA registry data support azacitidine effectiveness and safety in patients with lower- or higher-risk MDS treated in community practice.

Early mortality (EM; death ≤ 6 months from diagnosis) has been reported in several newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) trials. Before the era of novel agents, the incidence was 10%‐14%. Causes of death included infections/pneumonia, renal failure, refractory disease, and cardiac events. Staging systems, such as the revised International Staging System (r‐ISS), and prognostic factors including cytogenetics, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and myeloma‐specific factors, are useful to assess overall prognosis; however, they cannot predict EM. We evaluated patients treated with novel agents in the Connect MM® Registry and identified risk factors of the EM cohort. Eligible patients were enrolled in the registry within 60 days of diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between baseline characteristics and EM. Prediction matrices for EM were constructed from a logistic model. Between September 2009 and December 2011, 1493 patients were enrolled in the registry and had adequate follow‐up. Of these patients, 102 (6.8%) had EM and 1391 (93.2%) survived for > 180 days. Baseline factors significantly associated with increased EM risk included age > 75 years, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lower EQ‐5D mobility score, higher ISS stage, lower platelet count, and prior hypertension. Renal insufficiency trended toward increased EM risk. These risk factors were incorporated into a prediction matrix for EM. The EM prediction matrix uses differential weighting of risk factors to calculate EM risk in patients with NDMM. Identifying patients at risk for EM may provide new opportunities to implement patient‐specific treatment strategies to improve outcomes.

• Lenalidomide (vs no) maintenance therapy post-ASCT improved survival outcomes in patients with NDMM.• Using unselected registry patients, this study reproduced the survival benefits of lenalidomide maintenance observed in clinical trials.