Introduction: Distal end radius is the second most common location for giant cell tumours (GCTs) followed by the knee. Like at any other location, they are treated with extended curettage or resection but reportedly have an increased propensity for recurrence. This study aims to treat the recurrent distal end radius GCTs and their outcome after further surgeries.Patients and methods: This study was conducted retrospectively from 2009 to 2021 and included 32 patients with recurrent distal end radius GCTs with a mean age of 29.53 years (range: 18-45 years). Twenty-five recurrences occurred after curettage and seven after resection. Twelve lesions were treated with further extended curettage. Nineteen recurrent lesions were treated with resection and arthrodesis. One out of two soft tissue recurrences was treated with en bloc resection. The mean follow-up period was 45.25 months (range: 24-120).Results: The patients with joint preservations treated with further curettage and those where resection of soft tissue recurrences was done with salvage of joint had better functional outcomes with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 26.53 (Range: 22-30). The cases with arthrodesis had an average score of . The overall average MSTS score was 24.89.Conclusions: We conclude that local recurrence contained within the bone can be re-curetted. The isolated soft tissue recurrences can be re-excised. The bony lesions with extensive soft tissue extension should be treated with resection and reconstruction. The re-recurrence rate after further adequate treatment does not increase much.

Introduction: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a benign but locally aggressive bone tumor. It has a peak incidence between 30-40 years with a predilection for the epiphyseal/metaphyseal region of bone. The most common locations for bone GCT are the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal radius, and sacrum in decreasing order.Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 22 patients (13 females and nine males) with recurrent giant cell tumors around the knee joint between 2009-2022, with a mean age of 30.2 years (range: 18-55) were included. The patients were followed up monthly for three months, three-monthly for the next two years, six-monthly for the next five years, and thereafter, yearly. The mean follow-up period was 36.97 months (range 23-120 months).Results: There were 19 recurrences after curettages and three after resections. Re-extended curettage was done in 17 cases and the resultant cavities were filled with autologous bone grafts in six and with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement in the other 11 cases. Reconstruction with megaprosthesis was done in two patients whereas knee arthrodesis was done in two patients after wide resection. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of our series of 22 patients was 23.1 (Range: 19-30).Conclusion: Campanacci grade 1 and 2 lesions can be successfully treated with extended curettage and bone grafting/bone cementing. For patients with grade 3 lesions, there are two options available according to the financial status of the patient; the first option is reconstruction with prosthesis and the other option is arthrodesis.

BackgroundSoft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors. Good functional results can be achieved with tumor excision in combination with suitable supplemental adjuvant therapies if needed. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of wide resection of STS of the extremities. MethodologyIn this retrospective study, a total of 139 patients diagnosed with STS of the extremities by radiological and/or histopathological study/biopsy were included. All patients irrespective of metastasis were included. ResultsThe mean age of the patients in our study was 43.5 ± 18.89 years. Overall, the mean tumor size was found to be 11.81 ± 6.218 cm. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the most common histology encountered (41%). Synovial sarcoma was the second most common histology encountered (14.38%). Recurrence was observed in 14 (10.1%) patients. The overall survival was 64.7% in our study. ConclusionsThe surgical margin achieved during the surgery is the most detrimental factor in local tumor control, and the overall survival of the patient after resection mainly depends on the stage of the tumor.