Visual imaging modalities, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallow, for assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia have been part of the speech language pathologist’s (SLPs) armamentarium for the diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia for decades. Recently, the addition of high-resolution manometry (HRM) has enabled the SLP to evaluate pharyngeal pressures and upper esophageal sphincter relaxation. Taken together, the use of visual imaging modalities with HRM can improve interpretation of swallowing physiology and facilitate more effective treatment planning. The goal of this article is to describe a clinical paradigm using HRM as an adjunct to VFSS, by the SLP, in the assessment of complex dysphagia. Moreover, in three cases described, the value of manometric measurements in elucidating swallowing imaging studies and documenting physiologic change in response to treatment is highlighted. As technology in this area is evolving, so will the clinical use of HRM by the SLP. Limitations of current HRM systems and applications are discussed.

Background: No practice guidelines have been established for swallowing outcomes after cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize evidence for swallowing outcomes in patients undergoing CPM to treat symptomatic cricopharyngeal dysfunction, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol.

Tongue base pressures have been thought to provide primary bolus clearance through the pharynx during swallowing. The relationship between bolus driving pressures and residue remaining in the valleculae after the swallow has not been defined. Thirty-seven dysphagic patients who were evaluated with both videofluoroscopy (VFSS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) were identified within the University of Wisconsin Voice and Swallowing Outcomes database. Patients were categorized according to binary ratings of presence or absence of vallecular stasis as well as incomplete or complete tongue retraction on VFSS. Tongue base region pressures measured with HRM during saline swallows of 1 and 10 ml volumes were compared to ratings of vallecular stasis or tongue base retraction. No significant difference could be identified among mean peak HRM pressures when compared to presence or absence of vallecular stasis (1 ml saline: p = .1886; 10 ml saline: p = .7354). When categorized according to complete or incomplete tongue retraction, mean peak HRM pressures were significantly greater in the complete tongue retraction group as compared to incomplete tongue retraction (1 ml saline: p = .0223; 10 ml saline: p = .0100). Findings suggest there are multiple factors that lead to reduced vallecular clearance. In the absence of HRM measures, judging complete or incomplete tongue retraction on VFSS may be a more valid gauge of tongue base region pressures than vallecular clearance when planning dysphagia treatment.

Speech pathologists are often the first professionals to identify signs of a cricopharyngeal (CP) dysfunction and make recommendations for further care. There are many care options for patients with CP dysfunction, but it is unclear how certain interventions are used in practice. A paper-based survey employing two clinical cases involving suspected CP dysfunction (Case 1 with adequate pharyngeal strength and Case 2 with coexisting pharyngeal weakness) were sent to members of American Speech-Language Hearing Associations Special Interest Group 13. Respondents ranked the order of management approaches (swallowing therapy, further evaluation, and referral to another medical professional) and selected specific interventions under each approach that they would recommend for each case. Completed surveys from 206 respondents were entered into analysis. The majority of the respondents recommended swallowing therapy as a first approach for each case (Case 1: 64%; Case 2: 88%). The most prevalent swallowing exercises recommended were the Shaker (73%), effortful swallow (62%), and Mendelsohn maneuver (53%) for Case 1 and the effortful swallow (92%), Shaker (84%), and tongue-hold swallow (73%) for Case 2. Seventy-six percent of respondents recommended a referral for Case 1, while 38% recommended the same for Case 2. Respondents with access to more types of evaluative tools were more likely to recommend further evaluation, and those with access only to videofluoroscopy were less likely to recommend further evaluation. However, the high degree of variability in recommendations reflects the need for best practice guidelines for patients with signs of CP dysfunction.

Purpose Pharyngeal high-resolution manometry is an emerging practice for diagnosis of swallowing disorders in the upper aerodigestive tract. Advancement of a catheter through the upper esophageal sphincter may introduce safety considerations. There are no published studies of catheter placement complications, side effects, or tolerability. This study examines patient-reported side effects and tolerability of pharyngeal high-resolution manometry. Method Data were collected prospectively from 133 adult patients who underwent pharyngeal high-resolution manometry for the 1st time. Patients rated tolerability specific to “nose” and “throat” using a visual analog scale for 4 procedure time points: catheter passage, during the procedure, catheter removal, and after the procedure. Complications during catheter passage and removal were recorded. A telephone call was placed to the patient within 6 days to survey side effects experienced after the procedure. Results The patient sample was composed of 91 males and 42 females with a mean age of 66 years ( SD = 14.4). Tolerability scores for catheter passage showed no significant difference ( p = .7288) in the nose versus throat. Tolerability for females was significantly less ( p = .0144) than that for males. Participants with the shortest procedure duration showed greatest discomfort in the nose ( p = .0592) and throat ( p = .0286). Complications included gag response (14%), emesis (2%), and epistaxis (< 1%). Side effects included sore throat (16%), nose discomfort (16%), coughing (11 %), nosebleed (4%), and nausea/vomiting (4%). Conclusions High-resolution manometry appears to have high patient tolerability with low incidence of side effects. Rates of complications and side effects are similar to those reported for other transnasal procedures.