Introduction Over the past two years, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has greatly altered medical student education as well as daily life. Medical schools across the world were disrupted and had to immediately adapt the educational experience to the online environment in order to continue the delivery of quality medical education. However, COVID-19 was not the only recent pandemic. This posed the question, were similar disruptions and adaptations also seen in recent past pandemics such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) that could have prepared medical educators for COVID-19? This scoping review investigated the educational and personal impact of recent pandemics on medical students. Methods This review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews. Nine databases including PubMed, ERIC, and EMBASE were systematically searched using keywords and subject headings related to medical students and SARS, H1N1, MERS, Ebola, Zika, and COVID-19. Studies were limited to research studies published between 2000 and 2020 and in English. Based on exclusion and inclusion criteria, all studies were independently screened by two reviewers first by the title/abstract and then via full text. Data were extracted from the included studies and analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results A total of 174 studies fit the criteria. Seven major themes emerged from those studies: educational adaptations and online modifications, knowledge and attitudes of students, mental wellness of students, student involvement and use of telehealth, student vaccination, physical wellness of students, and stigma. Conclusion This review provided insights into how medical students were affected by recent pandemics and their perceptions of pivoting to online education, mental health, and knowledge of the diseases. Additionally, this review showcases the various educational adaptations that emerged uniquely during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as telehealth services or video conferencing tools, that can be utilized in a post-pandemic environment.

Fibrosarcomas are rare, malignant neoplasms of mesenchymal origin. Fibrosarcomas appear to be sporadic, but cases of fibrosarcomas secondary to radiation of nasopharyngeal carcinomas have been reported. Paranasal sinus fibrosarcomas (PNFS) are even rarer with few cases being reported since the 1950s. There have been several retrospective cohort studies examining PNFS; however, to our knowledge, no comprehensive review exists. This review aims to summarize the findings of all published cases of PNFS from the 1950s to the 2020s. We hope that a comprehensive review will assist in accurate and early diagnoses of PNFS, and help guide treatment as early treatment is associated with a favorable prognosis. This systematic review reports results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies were screened using established inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 26 studies were included for data extraction, and relevant data were collected and analyzed. In our study, the most common study type was case reports (n = 19). The most common presentation for PNFS included male gender (n = 17) with maxillary sinus (n = 57) involvement. Patients commonly presented with complaints of nasal obstruction (n = 15), epistaxis (n = 11), and facial fullness/pain (n = 9). Surgical resection was the mainstay treatment, with the use of chemotherapy or radiation depending on surgical margins and resectability. The diagnosis was commonly made with histological analysis. This review of the literature provides a summary and reference of important presenting factors, elements of diagnosis, and treatment options regarding PNFS to help bring awareness and guide the treatment of such a rare disease. Moving forward, there is a greater need for larger standardized studies that can further complement our findings, as well as more consistent reporting of cases.

In this case study, we discuss the observed anatomical variant of bilateral extensor indicis medii communis (EIMC) muscle. During a routine anatomical dissection of 48 upper limbs from 24 cadavers, two female cadavers (75 and 79 years of age) demonstrated bilateral EIMC (8.3%), while one male cadaver (86 years of age) demonstrated unilateral EIMC (4.2%). The noted EIMC shared a muscle belly with the extensor indicis, but had a distal attachment in the extensor hood of the third digit. This is a rare instance of a bilateral presentation of the extensor indicis medii communis muscle. There has been a limited number of cases in which a bilateral EIMC was discovered; however, such findings have been limited to one cadaver and at a lower frequency. This finding may demonstrate that bilateral EIMC may not be as rare as previously thought. Ultimately due to its infrequency, awareness of this variation may help physicians avoid improper muscle recognition when visualizing the area during procedures regarding the dorsum of the hand, as well as providing a possible site of tendon harvesting.

Unilateral adrenal hemorrhage is a rare but deadly complication that can occur secondary to causes such as trauma and metastasis. A 55-year-old male with a history of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and deep vein thrombosis managed with rivaroxaban presented with acute right abdominal and flank pain. A CT angiogram of the abdomen showed a retroperitoneal hematoma around the right adrenal gland, consistent with a unilateral adrenal hemorrhage. An MRI showed no signs of adrenal metastasis and the patient had no history of trauma. The volume of the hematoma did not change in size and the patient was hemodynamically stable, which only prompted supportive management. Anticoagulant use is a known risk factor for bilateral adrenal hemorrhage. However, this case demonstrates that unilateral adrenal hemorrhage can also be a complication, one that usually appears subclinically. It can present non-specifically but may progress to a more fatal bilateral hemorrhage. Hence, it demands a high index of suspicion for patients on systemic anticoagulation.