No abstract

Background: The conventionally understood pathogenesis of agminated Spitz nevi includes a mosaic HRAS mutation followed by copy number gains in 11p. However, we have recently observed agminated presentations of fusion-driven melanocytic neoplasms.Methods: We retrieved cases from our database of benign fusion-induced melanocytic neoplasms with an agminated presentation. Both the primary lesion and the secondary lesion were sequenced. TERT-promoter mutational testing and the melanoma fluorescence in situ hybridization assay were also performed.Results: Three cases were included. Two had a PRKCA fusion (partners ATP2B4 and MPZL1) and one had a ZCCHC8::ROS1 fusion. None of the cases met morphologic or molecular criteria for malignancy. There was no evidence of tumor progression in secondary lesions. The same fusion was identified in the primary and secondary lesions. None of the patients developed evidence of nodal or systemic metastasis. Conclusions:We present accumulating evidence that fusion-driven melanocytic neoplasms can present with an agminated presentation. The differential diagnosis of an agminated presentation versus a locally recurrent or potentially locally metastatic tumor is critical, and accurate diagnosis has significant prognostic and therapeutic consequences for the patient. As with HRAS mutations, fusion-driven melanocytic tumors may have an agminated presentation.

Proliferative nodules (PNs) are benign melanocytic proliferations that typically develop within congenital melanocytic nevi. These tumors have overlapping histological features with melanoma. Ancillary immunohistochemistry and genomic sequencing are often used in diagnostically challenging cases. To assess the utility of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunoreactivity and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation analysis in distinguishing PNs from melanoma arising in congenital nevi cases. Twenty-one PNs and 2 melanomas arising in congenital nevi were immunohistochemically stained with PRAME. Cases with adequate tissue were also assessed for TERT promoter mutations through sequencing studies. The positivity rates in the PN cases were compared with those of the melanomas. Two of 21 PN cases were diffusely positive for PRAME ($75% of the tumor cells positive). Two of 2 melanomas arising in congenital nevus cases were also diffusely PRAME positive. The difference was statistically significant using a Fisher exact test. None of the tumors harbored TERT promoter mutations. PRAME immunohistochemical marker may have diagnostic value in distinguishing diag-nostically challenging PNs from melanoma, but diffuse expression is not specific for melanoma.