The primary clinical outcome measure for evaluating multiple sclerosis in clinical trials has been Kurtzke's expanded disability status scale (EDSS). New therapies appear to favourably impact the course of multiple sclerosis and render continued use of placebo control groups more difficult. Consequently, future trials are likely to compare active treatment groups which will most probably require increased sample sizes in order to detect therapeutic efficacy. Because more responsive outcome measures will be needed for active arm comparison studies, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis appointed a Task Force that was charged with developing improved clinical outcome measures. This Task Force acquired contemporary clinical trial and historical multiple sclerosis data for meta-analyses of primary and secondary outcome assessments to provide a basis for recommending a new outcome measure. A composite measure encompassing the major clinical dimensions of arm, leg and cognitive function was identified and termed the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC). The MSFC consists of three objective quantitative tests of neurological function which are easy to administer. Change in this MSFC over the first year of observation predicted subsequent change in the EDSS, suggesting that the MSFC is more sensitive to change than the EDSS. This paper provides details concerning the development and testing of the MSFC.

No abstract

MS exacerbations produce a measurable and sustained effect on disability.

Among premature newborns with respiratory failure, low-dose inhaled nitric oxide did not reduce the overall incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, except among infants with a birth weight of at least 1000 g, but it did reduce the overall risk of brain injury. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006401 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Objective: To characterize whole-brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients over an 8-year period. The specific goals of this study were to determine if brain atrophy is related to subsequent disability status and to identify MRI correlates of atrophy progression. Methods: A follow-up study was conducted to reassess patients from a phase III trial of interferon-1a (IFN-1a) 8 years after randomization. Clinical and MRI data from 172 patients followed over 2 years in the original trial were used as baseline data. Follow-up data were obtained on 160 patients, including 134 patients with follow-up MRI examinations. Brain atrophy was estimated by automated calculation of brain parenchymal fraction. The relation between atrophy during the original trial and disability status at follow-up was determined. Correlations were also determined between lesion measurements from the original trial and the brain parenchymal fraction at follow-up. Results: Brain atrophy was correlated with subsequent disability status. Atrophy rate during the original trial was the most significant MRI predictor of disability status at follow-up. Brain atrophy at follow-up was related to lesion volumes measured during the original trial. Conclusions: The relation between atrophy progression and subsequent neurologic disability status suggests that atrophy progression during RRMS is clinically relevant. Therefore, atrophy progression may be a useful marker for disease progression in clinical trials. The relation between lesions and subsequent atrophy indicates that brain atrophy may be related to focal tissue damage at earlier points in time, but important predisposing or other factors contributing to atrophy remain undefined. MRI has fallen short of expectations in terms of providing a surrogate marker in MS. The lack of robust correlations between conventional MRI measures of pathology and clinical measures of disability has been attributed to various shortcomings of both MRI and clinical assessments. At least part of the discrepancy may be due to the use of MRI measurements that include both reversible and irreversible components of MS pathology. Conventional MRI lesion measurements also neglect to account for diffuse abnormalities in normal-appearing tissue in MS. One of the alternative MRI measures that have been proposed to monitor MS progression is the estimation of CNS atrophy. 1-11 In contrast to MRI-visible lesions, CNS atrophy is believed to reflect the net effect of severe and potentially irreversible processes such as demyelination and axonal loss. Measurement of the size of CNS structures may provide an indication of the total amount of tissue damage that has occurred up to a given point in time. New computer-assisted methods have been developed to precisely and reliably quantify tissue loss in MRI, 5-13 and atrophy has been shown to occur even in the early stages of MS. 3,4,6-9 However, previous longitudinal studies in MS 3,6-9,14-16 have not shown very strong or consistent relations between brain atrophy and disability...