Previous wetlands studies have thoroughly verified the usefulness of data from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors in various acquisition modes. However, the effect of the processing parameters in wetland classification remains poorly explored. In this study, we investigated the influence of speckle filters and decomposition methods with different combinations of filter and decomposition windows sizes on classification accuracy. We used a C-band Radarsat 2 image acquired over a wetland located in northeast Poland. We processed the SAR data using various speckle filters: boxcar, intensity-driven adaptive-neighborhood (IDAN), improved Lee sigma, refined Lee (in 5×5 to 11×11 pixel window sizes), and a nonlocal NL-SAR. Next, we processed the nonfiltered and filtered data using nine polarimetric decompositions, also in 5×5 to 11×11 pixel window sizes. The extracted polarimetric features were applied as an input dataset in the random forest classification model in single-and multidecomposition scenarios. In the single-decomposition scenario, the Cloude-Pottier decomposition produced the highest (72%) and the Touzi decomposition achieved the lowest (38%) accuracy. The IDAN filter with an 11×11 filter window and a 9×9 decomposition window had the highest, and the nonfiltered data with a 5×5 decomposition window had the lowest accuracy in the multidecomposition scenario. The most important features were the alpha parameter from the Cloude-Pottier decomposition, the polarimetric contribution of the Shannon entropy, and the volume backscattering components. The results stress the importance of appropriate processing parameters in the SAR data classification workflow, and the study guides in selecting the most suitable combination of radar image processing parameters for wetland classification.
<p>In this study, we investigated the influence of speckle filters and decomposition methods with different combinations of filter and decomposition windows sizes on classification accuracy. The study area was a part of Biebrza National Park, located in Northeast Poland. The C-Band SAR image from Radarsat 2 sensor was processed using various speckle filters (boxcar, IDAN, improved Lee sigma, refined Lee) in 5x5, 7x7, 9x9, and 11x11 pixel window sizes. We processed the filtered data using nine polarimetric decompositions also in 5x5, 7x7, 9x9, and 11x11 pixel window sizes. We used the calculated polarimetric features to conduct a supervised classification with random forest machine learning algorithms for each combination of processing parameters in three different scenarios: (1) each decomposition product was used separately as a model input; (2) all decomposition products with the same speckle filtering method were used as a model input; (3) all decomposition products with all speckle filtering methods were used together as the model input. Overall, the most accurate classification model (87%) was produced in scenario 3 with an 11x11 filter and decomposition windows. In scenario 1, the highest overall accuracy achieved the Cloude-Pottier decomposition (72%) and the lowest produced the Touzi decomposition (38%). In scenario 2, the IDAN filter provided the highest accuracy (84%) with an 11x11 filter window and a 9x9 decomposition window. The obtained results show that the selection of appropriate processing parameters is an important step in the SAR data classification workflow. Our study also indicates the most suitable combination of radar image processing parameters for wetland classification.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.