The moisture adsorption isotherms of pear were determined at 15?C, 30?C and 45?C using the standard static gravimetric method over a range of water activity from 0.112 to 0.920. The experimental data were fitted with isotherm equations recommended in ASAE Standard D245.5. In order to find which equation gives the best results, large number of numerical experiments were performed. After that, several statistical criteria proposed in scientific literature for estimation and selection of the best sorption isotherm equations were used. For each equation and experimental data set, the average performance index was calculated and models were ranked afterwards. After that, some statistical rejection criteria were checked (D?Agostino-Pearson test of normality, single-sample run test and significance and precision of the model parameters). The performed statistical analysis shows that the Guggenheim-Anderson-de Boer (GAB) equation has the highest value of average performance index, but higher correlation between pair of parameters leads to lower precision of estimated parameters.[Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. TR 31058]
In this study, a power series which can generate different families of new water sorption isotherm models were presented. Experimentally obtained values for equilibrium moisture content of pear for three different temperatures, 15, 30 and 45C, and water activities, from 0.112 to 0.920, as well as literature experimental values for equilibrium moisture content of potato for three different temperatures, 30, 45 and 60C, and water activities, from 0.112 to 0.900, were fitted with the newly generated sorption isotherm models plus the referent Anderson model known in the literature as Guggenheim‐Anderson‐de Boer (GAB) model. In order to find which model gives the best results for approximation of experimental sorption data, several statistical criteria proposed in scientific literature were used. For each model and experimental data set, the average performance index was calculated and models were ranked afterwards. After that, some statistical rejection criteria were checked (D’Agostino‐Pearson test of normality, single‐sample run test, confidence intervals of estimated parameters, significance and precision of the model parameters). The performed statistical analysis shows that the two newly generated three‐parameter models, M32 and M34, give the better fit to the sorption data of pear than the referent three‐parameter Anderson model, while M32 gives the best fit to the sorption data of potato. Practical Applications The sorption isotherms of food materials are of great importance in the food industry and technology, especially for the design and optimization of the drying equipment and in the approach to the prediction of shelf life stability of material. The new generated three‐parameter models, M32 and M34, can be successfully used in practical calculations of the equilibrium moisture content, which is an important parameter in storage conditions of dry food materials. With the incorporation of M32 or M34 in the drying model, more accurate values of transient moisture and temperature profiles on the dried materials will be obtained.
In this study, a thin - layer drying of pear slices as a function of drying conditions were examined. The experimental data set of thin - layer drying kinetics at five drying air temperatures 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70?C, and three drying air velocities 1, 1.5 and 2 m s-1 were obtained on the experimental setup, designed to imitate industrial convective dryer. Five well known thin - layer drying models from scientific literature were used to approximate the experimental data in terms of moisture ratio. In order to find which model gives the best results, numerical experiments were made. For each model and data set, the statistical performance index, (?), and chi-squared, (?2), value were calculated and models were ranked afterwards. The performed statistical analysis shows that the model of Midilli gives the best statistical results. Because the effect of drying air temperature and drying air velocity on the empirical parameters was not included in the base Midilli model, in this study the generalized form of this model was developed. With this model, the drying kinetic data of pear slices can be approximated with high accuracy. The effective moisture diffusivity was determined by using Fick?s second laws. The obtained values of the effective moisture diffusivity, (Deff), during drying ranged between 6.49 x 10-9 and 3.29 x 10-8 m2 s-1, while the values of activation energy (E0) varied between 28.15 to 30.51 kJ mol-1.
The hot air convective drying of blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) in a thin layer was performed using a laboratory-scale dryer. The experiments were carried out at drying air temperatures of 60, 70 and 80 o C, and drying air velocities of 0.5 and 1.5 m/s. At higher values of the drying air temperature and the drying air velocity, less time was required for the convective drying of blueberries, i.e. the drying time of blueberries decreased with increasing drying air temperatures and velocities. The experimental data obtained during the drying process were fitted to ten different mathematical models. The Midilli et al. model was found to be the most appropriate model for explaining the drying behavior of blueberries during convective drying. Effective moisture diffusion coefficients were calculated using the Fick's diffusion model, ranging from 9.66 x 10-12 m 2 /s to 9.67 x 10-11 m 2 /s. These values were found to increase proportionally with the increase in drying air temperatures and velocities. The lowest total color change and shrinkage of dried blueberries were recorded during freeze drying. A water activity less than 0.6 was measured at a blueberry moisture content of 0.235 kg w /kg d.m , a drying air temperature of 26 o C and a relative air humidity of 60 %.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.