Oxidative stress can induce genetic instability and change cellular processes, resulting in colorectal cancer. Additionally, adaptation of oxidative defense causes therapy resistance, a major obstacle in successful cancer treatment. Peroxiporins are aquaporin membrane channels that facilitate H2O2 membrane permeation, crucial for regulating cell proliferation and antioxidative defense. Here, we investigated four colon cancer cell lines (Caco-2, HT-29, SW620, and HCT 116) for their sensitivity to H2O2, cellular antioxidative status, and ROS intracellular accumulation after H2O2 treatment. The expression of peroxiporins AQP1, AQP3, and AQP5 and levels of NRF2, the antioxidant transcription factor, and PPARγ, a transcription factor that regulates lipid metabolism, were evaluated before and after oxidative insult. Of the four tested cell lines, HT-29 was the most resistant and showed the highest expression of all tested peroxiporins and the lowest levels of intracellular ROS, without differences in GSH levels, catalase activity, nor NF2 and PPARγ levels. Caco-2 shows high expression of AQP3 and similar resistance as HT-29. These results imply that oxidative stress resistance can be obtained by several mechanisms other than the antioxidant defense system. Regulation of intracellular ROS through modulation of peroxiporin expression may represent an additional strategy to target the therapy resistance of cancer cells.

Aquaporin 3 (AQP3) is a peroxiporin, a membrane protein that channels hydrogen peroxide in addition to water and glycerol. AQP3 expression also correlates with tumor progression and malignancy and is, therefore, a potential target in breast cancer therapy. In addition, epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in breast cancer. Therefore, we investigated whether disruption of the lipid raft harboring EGFR could affect AQP3 expression, and conversely, whether AQP3 silencing would affect the EGFR/phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/Protein kinase B (PKB or Akt) signaling pathway in breast cancer cell lines with different malignant capacities. We evaluated H2O2 uptake, cell migratory capacity, and expression of PI3K, pAkt/Akt in three breast cancer cell lines, MCF7, SkBr3, and SUM159PT, and in the nontumorigenic breast epithelial cell line MCF10A. Our results show different responses between the tested cell lines, especially when compared to the nontumorigenic cell line. Neither lipid raft disruption nor EGF stimuli had an effect on PI3K/Akt pathway in MCF10A cell line. AQP3-silencing in SkBr3 and SUM159PT showed that AQP3 can modulate PI3K/Akt activation in these cells. Interestingly, SUM159PT cells increase nuclear factor-E2–related factor 2 (NRF2) in response to lipid raft disruption and EGF stimuli, suggesting an oxidative-dependent response to these treatments. These results suggest that in breast cancer cell lines, AQP3 is not directly related to PI3K/Akt pathway but rather in a cell-line-dependent manner.

Breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) are among the most common and deadly cancers affecting women worldwide. Both are complex diseases with marked heterogeneity. Despite the induction of screening programs that increase the frequency of earlier diagnosis of BC, at a stage when the cancer is more likely to respond to therapy, which does not exist for OC, more than 50% of both cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Initial therapy can put the cancer into remission. However, recurrences occur frequently in both BC and OC, which are highly cancer-subtype dependent. Therapy resistance is mainly attributed to a rare subpopulation of cells, named cancer stem cells (CSC) or tumor-initiating cells, as they are capable of self-renewal, tumor initiation, and regrowth of tumor bulk. In this review, we will discuss the distinctive markers and signaling pathways that characterize CSC, their interactions with the tumor microenvironment, and the strategies they employ to evade immune surveillance. Our focus will be on identifying the common features of breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) and ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSC) and suggesting potential therapeutic approaches.

No abstract