RCTs cannot yield reliable data unless they are planned, conducted, analyzed, and reported in ways that are methodologically sound and appropriate to the question being asked. The quality of any RCT must be critically evaluated before its relevance to patient care can be considered.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the prodrug ramipril and its active ACE-inhibiting metabolite ramiprilat were investigated in an open, randomised, three-way cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received 2.5 mg ramipril orally, 2.5 mg ramipril intravenously and 2.5 mg ramiprilat intravenously. The absolute bioavailability as judged by ramipril plasma AUC was 15%, by ramiprilat plasma AUC, 44%. Ramiprilat formation from intravenous ramipril was 53% and from oral ramipril 28%. Urinary recovery of oral ramipril was 23%, i.v. ramipril 49%, and i.v. ramiprilat 68% of the given dose. Maximum ACE inhibition was highest (100%) after i.v. ramiprilat; it was 99% after i.v. ramipril and 84% following oral ramipril. ACE inhibition over 24 h was highest after i.v. ramipril, 2% less with i.v. ramiprilat and 34% less with oral ramipril. Ramiprilat renal clearance was concentration dependent. The biological availability of ramipril can best be judged by ramiprilat AUC, urinary recovery of ramipril and metabolites, or ACE inhibition over 24 h. It is concluded that the bioavailability of oral ramipril seems to be in the range of 44-66%.

Background Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), has been shown to effectively prevent thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is a paucity of data on the antithrombotic efficacy and safety of dabigatran in the resolution of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi in AF patients.Objective The primary objective of the RE-LATED AF trial is to assess whether dabigatran results in a faster complete LAA thrombus resolution as compared to vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon. Secondary objectives are to assess the impact of dabigatran on complete LAA thrombus resolution rate within 6 weeks of treatment and change in LAA thrombus volume under treatment. Furthermore, this study aims to assess and compare safety and tolerability of dabigatran vs. phenprocoumon. MethodsThe study is designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled, explorative, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial. Patients with AF and left atrial appendage thrombus confirmed by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) will be randomized to receive either dabigatran (150 mg bid) or phenprocoumon (INR 2-3) for the resolution of LAA thrombus formation for at least 21 days. Thrombus resolution will be determined by TEE 3 weeks after treatment initiation and subsequently at weeks 4 and 6, if the LAA thrombus has not been resolved before. A total of 110 patients are planned to be randomized. Conclusion This is the first prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trial investigating safety and efficacy of a NOAC for the resolution of LAA thrombi in patients with non-valvular AF.

BackgroundKupffer cell-dependent ischemia / reperfusion (I/R) injury after liver transplantation is still of high clinical relevance, as it is strongly associated with primary dysfunction and primary nonfunction of the graft. Glycine, a non-toxic, non-essential amino acid has been conclusively shown in various experiments to prevent both activation of Kupffer cells and reperfusion injury. Based on both experimental and preliminary clinical data this study protocol was designed to further evaluate the early effect of glycine after liver transplantation.Methods / designA prospective double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study with two parallel groups in a total of 130 liver transplant recipients was designed to assess the effect of multiple intravenous doses of glycine after transplantation. Primary endpoints in hierarchical order are: peak levels of both aspartat-amino-transaminase (AST) and alanine-amino-transaminase (ALT) as surrogates for the progression of liver related injury, as well as both graft and patient survival up to 2 years after transplantation. Furthermore, the effect of glycine on cyclosporine A-induced nephrotoxicity is evaluated.DiscussionThe ongoing clinical trial represents an advanced element of the research chain, along which a scientific hypothesis has to go by, in order to reach the highest level of evidence; a randomized, prospective, controlled double-blinded clinical trial. If the data of this ongoing research project confirm prior findings, glycine would improve the general outcome after liver transplantation.

Adverse events and inconveniences are inherent to nontherapeutic studies in healthy subjects. From the volunteer's perspective it appears that the incidence of adverse experiences in such studies exceeds the reported frequencies from investigators considerably. This finding suggests that investigators are usually not aware or able to ascertain the true incidence of adverse events. The present survey also confirms that pertinent information on the personal history may be unreliable. Volunteers are reluctant to answer questions regarding, in particular, their smoking habits, caffeine and alcohol consumption. Regarding the matter of informed consent, a noteworthy contradiction between the volunteers' attitude and behaviour became apparent. Although the volunteers admit that even rather minor adverse events ordinarily would discourage them, they still consent to enrollment. In view of this apparent contradiction, there is no alternative to the investigator's personal responsibility to counsel and protect the subject. Surveys such as this one may contribute to the awareness that the explicitness of GCP guidelines merely define the format, but not the content quality of these fundamental ethical values, which remain the unique burden and challenge of the investigator.