BackgroundThis position statement provides clinical recommendations for the assessment of pain, level of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium in critically ill infants and children. Admission to a neonatal or paediatric intensive care unit (NICU, PICU) exposes a child to a series of painful and stressful events. Accurate assessment of the presence of pain and non-pain-related distress (adequacy of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium) is essential to good clinical management and to monitoring the effectiveness of interventions to relieve or prevent pain and distress in the individual patient.MethodsA multidisciplinary group of experts was recruited from the members of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). The group formulated clinical questions regarding assessment of pain and non-pain-related distress in critically ill and nonverbal children, and searched the PubMed/Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases for studies describing the psychometric properties of assessment instruments. Furthermore, level of evidence of selected studies was assigned and recommendations were formulated, and grade or recommendations were added on the basis of the level of evidence.ResultsAn ESPNIC position statement was drafted which provides clinical recommendations on assessment of pain (n = 5), distress and/or level of sedation (n = 4), iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (n = 3) and delirium (n = 3). These recommendations were based on the available evidence and consensus amongst the experts and other members of ESPNIC.ConclusionsThis multidisciplinary ESPNIC position statement guides professionals in the assessment and reassessment of the effectiveness of treatment interventions for pain, distress, inadequate sedation, withdrawal syndrome and delirium.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4344-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ORPHINE HAS BEEN ONE OF the most frequently used drugs to relieve pain in many age groups. Nevertheless, debate continues about whether morphine and analgesic therapy should serve as standard of care for preterm newborns who have received ventilatory support, 1 despite the recognition that all preterm neonates feel pain. Lack of a gold standard to assess neonatal pain, fear of adverse effects, and uncertainty about the long-term effects of opioids in the neurodevelopmental outcome of newborns contribute to this clinical conundrum. Although numerous neonatal pain instruments are available, they have been based and validated on models of acute pain. 2 It is difficult, therefore, to measure the analgesic effect of morphine in neonates. Suggested adverse effects of morphine are hypotension, 3-6 sei

The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument for children aged 0-3 years. Subjects were 158 neonates and toddlers after major abdominal or thoracic surgery. Trained nurses rated the children's pain at 3, 6 and 9 h postoperative on the Pediatric Surgical Intensive Care Unit using the COMFORT and a VAS for pain. Interrater reliability of the COMFORT items proved to be good (Kappa 0.63-0.93) for all items with the exception of the item 'Respiratory response', which was moderate (Kappa 0.54). LISREL analyses showed that the structure of the COMFORT data was best represented by three latent variables: COMFORT 'behaviour' with loadings from the behavioural items (Alertness, Calmness, Respiratory response/Crying, Physical movement, Muscle tone and Facial tension) and separate latent variables for 'Heart rate baseline' (HR) and 'Mean arterial blood pressure baseline' (MAP). Factor loadings of the items were invariant across time, indicating stability of the structure. The latent variables COMFORT 'behaviour' and VAS pain were highly interrelated indicating congruent validity. Stability of COMFORT 'behaviour' and VAS pain was moderate which might be due to varying painful episodes in this sample. HR and MAP, although stable across time, were weakly related to VAS pain and COMFORT 'behaviour'. These findings support the use of the COMFORT 'behaviour' scale to assess postoperative pain in neonates and infants.

The COMFORT-B scale is a reliable alternative to the original COMFORT scale. The cutoff points of the COMFORT-B scale in conjunction with the Nurse Interpretation Score of Sedation facilitate the use of sedation algorithms on the pediatric intensive care unit.