To investigate the floodplain influence on carbon speciation and export to the northern Gulf of Mexico, water samples were collected monthly from two sites in the East Pearl River (EPR) basin during 2006-2008. Additionally, four spatial surveys in the river basin between those two sites were also conducted. Compared with the upstream sampling site at Bogalusa, MS, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) concentrations were 36% and 55% lower, respectively, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration was 49% higher at the downstream Stennis Space Center (SSC) site. In addition, the bulk DOC pool at SSC had a higher colloidal fraction than at Bogalusa (75% vs. 68%). Detailed spatial surveys revealed the differences between the upstream and downstream stations resulted both from input from Hobolochitto Creek, a tributary of the EPR, and from influence of the swamp-rich floodplain. The contributions from Hobolochitto Creek to the carbon pool in the EPR basin were lowest during a high flow event and reached a maximum during the dry season. Meanwhile, the floodplain in the EPR basin acted as a significant sink for DOC, POC and particulate nitrogen during summer and for suspended sediment during a high flow event. However, the floodplain was converted into a source of suspended sediment, DOC, and POC to the EPR during winter, revealing a dynamic nature and seasonality in the floodplain influence. Consistent with its dominant forest coverage, abundant wetlands along the river corridor, and mild anthropogenic disturbance, the Pearl River basin above Bogalusa generally had higher yields of DOC and POC (1903 and 1386 kg-C km-2 yr-1 , respectively), but a lower yield of DIC (2126 kg-C km-2 yr-1) compared to other North American rivers. An estimation based on a mass balance approach suggests the interactions between 3 floodplain and the main river stem could reduce the annual DIC and POC export fluxes from downstream of the EPR by 24% and 40%, respectively, but enhance the annual riverine DOC export by 25%. Similar scenarios likely occur in other wetland-rich coastal rivers and are capable of significantly altering the current estimation of riverine carbon export.
Cu and Zn are known to be abundant in swine feces; hence, concentrations of these metals need to be lowered before swine feces are applied to land in order to prevent potential environmental problems. The main objective of this study was to develop an appropriate chemical process to remove Cu and Zn from swine feces using acid extractions. The removal efficiencies of Cu and Zn decreased in the order of H2SO4 > HNO3 > organic acids (citric and oxalic acids). Owing to the highest removal efficiencies of Cu and Zn by using H2SO4, it was selected for further elimination of Cu and Zn from swine feces. By using H2SO4, the optimal concentration, solid-to-liquid ratio, and reaction time were 2%, 1:50, and 8 h, respectively. At the optimum conditions, Cu concentration was decreased from 198 mg/kg to 40.1 mg/kg and Zn concentration from 474 mg/kg to 80.0 mg/kg, with removal rates of 79.7% and 83.1%, respectively. The low Cu removal efficiency, resulting from the strong complexation between Cu and organic matter of swine feces, was improved by the increase in the reaction time and H2SO4 solution concentrations. However, about half of the total nitrogen (TN) was also removed by using H2SO4, indicating that the swine feces treated with H2SO4 may have poor value as fertilizer. Additional studies are required to find an optimal method to maintain TN concentrations while simultaneously removing Cu and Zn.
Subsurface biogeochemistry and contaminant dynamics during the remediation of diesel-contamination by in-situ soil flushing were investigated at a site located in a coastal region. An in-situ sampler containing diesel-contaminated soils separated into two size fractions (<0.063- and <2-mm) was utilized in two monitoring wells: DH1 (located close to the injection and extraction wells for in-situ soil flushing) and DH2 (located beyond sheet piles placed to block the transport of leaked diesel). Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations and biogeochemical properties were monitored both in soil and groundwater for six months. A shift occurred in the groundwater type from Ca-HCO to Na-Cl due to seawater intrusion during intense pumping, while the concentrations of Ni, Cu, Co, V, Cr, and Se increased substantially following surfactant (TWEEN 80) injection. The in-situ sampler with fine particles was more sensitive to variations in conditions during the remedial soil flushing process. In both wells, soil TPH concentrations in the <0.063-mm fraction were much higher than those in the <2-mm fraction. Increases in soil TPH in DH1 were consistent with the expected outcomes following well pumping and surfactant injection used to enhance TPH extraction. However, the number of diesel-degrading microorganisms decreased after surfactant injection. 16S-rRNA gene-based analysis also showed that the community composition and diversity depended on both particle size and diesel contamination. The multidisciplinary approach to the contaminated site assessments showed that soil flushing with surfactant enhanced diesel extraction, but negatively impacted in-situ diesel biodegradation as well as groundwater quality. The results also suggest that the in-situ sampler can be an effective monitoring tool for subsurface biogeochemistry as well as contaminant dynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.