BackgroundThe incidence of brain metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is expected to increase as a result of prolonged survival due to the recent advances in HCC treatment. However, there is no definite treatment strategy for brain metastasis from HCC mainly due to its rarity and dismal prognosis. To provide helpful recommendations in treatment of brain metastasis from HCC, the authors aimed to identify prognostic factors that influence survival rates with a review of the recently published data.MethodsThirty-three cases of brain metastasis, whose incidence was 0.65%, were selected from a total of 5015 HCC patients and reviewed retrospectively in terms of clinical and radiological features.ResultsMedian overall survival time after diagnosis of brain metastasis was 10.4 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-15.7 weeks) with 1-, 6- and 12-month survival rates, of 79%, 24% and 6%, respectively. Median survival of the patients treated with surgical resection or surgical resection followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (25.3 weeks; range, 15.8-34.8 weeks) was longer than that of the patients treated with gamma knife surgery (GKS), WBRT, or GKS followed by WBRT (10.4 weeks; range, 7.5-13.3 weeks) as well as that of patients treated with only steroids (1 week; range, 0.0-3.3 weeks) (p < 0.001). Child-Pugh’s classification A group had a longer median survival time than Child-Pugh’s classification B or C group (14.4 weeks vs 8.4 weeks, p = 0.038). RPA class I & II group had also a longer median survival time than RPA class III group did (13.4 weeks vs 2.4 weeks, p = 0.001). Surgical resection (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.66, p = 0.006) and good liver function at the time of brain metastasis (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.69, p = 0.007) were found to be the powerful prognostic factors for favorable survival in the multivariate analysis. In addition, presence of intratumoral hemorrhage was a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival.ConclusionAlthough HCC patients with brain metastasis showed a very dismal prognosis, surgical intervention was shown to lead to relative prolongation of the survival time, especially in those with preserved hepatic function.

No abstract

Objective: The number of small to medium sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients presenting with serviceable hearing has steadily increased. There are various treatment strategies for small to medium sized VS, including microsurgery (MS), gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS), and serial observations using magnetic resonance imaging. In this study, we presented the long-term outcomes of patients with small to medium sized VS with serviceable hearing. We also evaluated the potential prognostic factors for hearing preservation and discussed appropriate treatment strategies. Methods: A retrospective review of 504 cases of all VS patients who underwent MS or GKS between 1993 and July 2019 was conducted. Surgical resection was performed on 267 patients using the retro-sigmoid approach and 55 (20.6%) of them were small to medium sized VS. GKS was performed on 237 patients and 175 (73.8%) of them were small to medium sized VS. Small to medium sized VS was defined as less than 25 mm in the greatest dimension. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 51 patients with small to medium sized VS with serviceable hearing were enrolled in this study and underwent either MS (n = 21) or GKS (n = 30). To define the clinical characteristics of the patients, clinical data at the time of treatment, age, sex, presenting symptoms, tumor location type, preoperative hearing status, posttreatment related complications, recurrence, and hearing loss progression-free survival data were collected. Results: In the MS group, the hearing preservation rate was 71.4% and the tumor control rate was 100%. In the GKS group, the tumor control rate was 93.3% and two patients experienced recurrence at a median interval of 41.5 months. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the hearing progression-free survival rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-years following GKS were 80, 66.7, and 53.3%, respectively. The MS group had a higher hearing preservation rate at 5 years (71.4 versus 53.3%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.173). Hearing preservation was statistically significant when the preoperative hearing status was class A in the GKS group (p = 0.016), but it was not statistically significant in the MS group (p = 0.777). In the MS group, medial type VS had a higher hearing preservation rate (80%) than the lateral fundal extended type VS (63.6%), and this difference was almost close to statistical significance (p = 0.058). The GKS group had a higher occurrence of postoperative tinnitus (23.3%) than the MS group (9.5%). Conclusion: MS was more suitable for patients who are younger, have good physical status, good preoperative hearing status including AAO-HNS class B, and medial type VS. GKS was more suitable for patients who are elderly, have poor physical status, preoperative AAO-HNS class A hearing.