Introduction: Better transparency of research results and participant engagement may help address poor participant accrual in paediatric clinical research. We conducted formative research to assess the acceptability of lay summaries and thank you notes, as well as to refine and expand guidance on participant and family engagement in Pediatric Trials Network's (PTN) pragmatic paediatric clinical research. Methods: Informed by draft PTN guidance, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with adolescent clinical trial participants and caregivers of paediatric participants in four trials conducted by PTN across eight sites. Participants were shown multiple versions of mock lay summaries and thank you notes and asked questions on their preferences for content and layout, and on trial communications. We used applied thematic analysis to analyse the data. Results: We interviewed 27 individuals engaged in PTN research: 24 caregivers and 3 adolescents. During a trial, participants want regular updates on study progress, reminders of the study purpose and reassurances of data confidentiality. After the trial, participants want to learn the aggregated results, particularly medication effectiveness. Participants reported that lay summaries should include a review of the study's purpose, methods and length, and that they expect to learn individual-level results. Participants stated that thank you notes must be of sufficient length to be meaningful.
Characterize the use, efficacy, and safety of poractant alfa and calfactant surfactants compared to beractant in preterm infants receiving late surfactant. STUDY DESIGN: We included infants <37 weeks gestational age (GA) discharged from Pediatrix Medical Group-managed neonatal intensive care units . Efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 184,770 infants administered surfactant at any time, 7846 (4.23%) received late surfactant at a median (25th, 75th percentile) PNA of 8 days (3, 22); specifically, 2976 received poractant alfa (38%), 2890 beractant (37%), and 1936 calfactant (25%). We identified no significant differences in composite efficacy or safety outcomes between surfactants in the primary analysis, but 33-36 week GA infants administered poractant alfa had significantly greater odds of developing a safety event. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to beractant, there is no evidence of overall superior efficacy or safety of poractant alfa.
Background: Infants frequently receive metronidazole at variable doses and duration for surgical site infection prophylaxis and treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Seizures are a rare (but potentially devastating) side effect of metronidazole, yet the prevalence of seizures in infants, as well as the relationship with metronidazole dose and exposure, are unknown. Methods: We examined the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse for infants in neonatal intensive care units from 1997 to 2018 who received at least 1 dose of metronidazole during their first 120 days of life. We used an existing population pharmacokinetic model to simulate exposure parameters, estimating multivariable associations between metronidazole dosing and exposure parameters, and the occurrence of seizure. Results: There were 19,367 intravenous doses of metronidazole given to 1546 infants, and 31 experienced a seizure. Infants with a seizure had a longer median (interquartile values) duration of metronidazole exposure than those without (11 days [6, 15] vs. 7 [4, 11], P = 0.01). Each added day of metronidazole (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02–1.10), and each standard deviation increase in cumulative area under the plasma concentration−time curve (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11–1.45) were associated with increased odds of seizure. Higher simulated maximum plasma concentration was associated with lower odds of seizure (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.96). Conclusions: Longer metronidazole exposure and higher cumulative exposure could be associated with increased odds of infant seizures. Using a large observational dataset allowed us to identify a rare adverse event, but prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and further characterize metronidazole dose- and exposure-safety relationships.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.