Objective
Prostate cancer patients who receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) often experience many physical and psychological side effects. ADT may be associated with increased risk for depression, but the relationship between ADT and depression is not fully understood. This study used a longitudinal design to assess depressive symptomatology in patients receiving ADT compared to two groups of matched controls.
Methods
Participants were men initiating ADT treatment (ADT+ group; n = 61) and their matched controls: prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (ADT− group; n = 61) and no-cancer controls (CA− group; n = 61). Depressive symptomatology was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale at ADT initiation and again six months later. Differences in depressive symptomatology and rates of clinically-significant depressive symptomatology were analyzed between groups at each time point and within groups over time. Results: Between baseline and follow-up, ADT+ participants demonstrated increased depressive symptomatology and increased rates of clinically-significant depressive symptomatology (ps < .05). ADT+ participants also reported greater depressive symptomatology than both control groups at follow-up (ps < .001). Rates of clinically-significant depressive symptomatology were higher in the ADT+ group than the ADT− and CA− groups at both time points (baseline: 28%, 5%, 12%; follow-up: 39%, 9%, 11%).
Conclusions
Findings support the hypothesis that ADT administration yields increases in depression and suggest that the mechanism behind ADT’s association with depression should be explored and that prostate cancer patients treated with ADT should receive particular focus in depression screening and intervention.
Findings demonstrate the positive psychometric properties of the MFSI-SF, provide evidence for its usefulness in medically ill and nonmedically ill individuals, and support its use in future studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.