No abstract

Understanding source code is crucial for successful software maintenance, and navigating the call graph is especially helpful to understand source code [12]. We compared maintenance performance across four different development environments: an IDE without any call graph exploration tool, a Call Hierarchy tool as found in Eclipse, and the tools Stacksplorer [7] and Blaze [11]. Using any of the call graph exploration tools more developers could solve certain maintenance tasks correctly. Only Stacksplorer and Blaze, however, were also able to decrease task completion times, although the Call Hierarchy offers access to a larger part of the call graph. To investigate if this result was caused by a change in navigation behavior between the tools, we used a set of predictive models to create formally comparable descriptions of programmer navigation. The results suggest that the decrease in task completion times has been caused by Stacksplorer and Blaze promoting call graph navigation more than the Call Hierarchy tool.

We present PocketDRAGON, a demonstrator prototype that allows direct manipulation video navigation on mobile touchscreen devices. In contrast to traditional video navigation techniques, PocketDRAGON does not require any overlay UI elements that occupy valuable screen real estate and obstruct the users' view on the video. Also, direct manipulation video navigation techniques have been shown to compare favorably to the established timeline slider interfaces in terms of performance times, intuitiveness, precision, and perceived ease of use. Our demonstrator system still uses a backend server for the computationally expensive parts of the algorithms but delivers the full-fledged user experience on the mobile device.

We present a study that explores how literary scholars interact with physical and digital documents in their daily work. Motivated by findings from this study, we propose refactoring the working environment of our target audience to improve the integration of digital material into established paper-centric processes. This is largely facilitated through the use of hybrid documents, i.e., cross-modal compound documents that employ a printed book for rich, tangible interaction in tandem with a digital component for matching interactive augmentation on a digital workbench. The results from two user studies in which we evaluated increasingly detailed prototypes demonstrate that this design offers better support for central workflows in literary studies than currently prevalent approaches.

No abstract