Background:In the INRG dataset, the hypothesis that any segmental chromosomal alteration might be of prognostic impact in neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification (MNA) was tested.Methods:The presence of any segmental chromosomal alteration (chromosome 1p deletion, 11q deletion and/or chromosome 17q gain) defined a segmental genomic profile. Only tumours with a confirmed unaltered status for all three chromosome arms were considered as having no segmental chromosomal alterations.Results:Among the 8800 patients in the INRG database, a genomic type could be attributed for 505 patients without MNA: 397 cases had a segmental genomic type, whereas 108 cases had an absence of any segmental alteration. A segmental genomic type was more frequent in patients >18 months and in stage 4 disease (P<0.0001). In univariate analysis, 11q deletion, 17q gain and a segmental genomic type were associated with a poorer event-free survival (EFS) (P<0.0001, P=0.0002 and P<0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis modelling EFS, the parameters age, stage and a segmental genomic type were retained in the model, whereas the individual genetic markers were not (P<0.0001 and RR=2.56; P=0.0002 and RR=1.8; P=0.01 and RR=1.7, respectively).Conclusion:A segmental genomic profile, rather than the single genetic markers, adds prognostic information to the clinical markers age and stage in neuroblastoma patients without MNA, underlining the importance of pangenomic studies.

Background:In neuroblastoma (NB), the presence of segmental chromosome alterations (SCAs) is associated with a higher risk of relapse.Methods:In order to analyse the role of SCAs in infants with localised unresectable/disseminated NB without MYCN amplification, we have performed an array CGH analysis of tumours from infants enroled in the prospective European INES trials.Results:Tumour samples from 218 out of 300 enroled patients could be analysed. Segmental chromosome alterations were observed in 11%, 20% and 59% of infants enroled in trials INES99.1 (localised unresectable NB), INES99.2 (stage 4s) and INES99.3 (stage 4) (P<0.0001). Progression-free survival was poorer in patients whose tumours harboured SCA, in the whole population and in trials INES99.1 and INES99.2, in the absence of clinical symptoms (log-rank test, P=0.0001, P=0.04 and P=0.0003, respectively). In multivariate analysis, a SCA genomic profile was the strongest predictor of poorer progression-free survival.Conclusion:In infants with stage 4s MYCN-non-amplified NB, a SCA genomic profile identifies patients who will require upfront treatment even in the absence of other clinical indication for therapy, whereas in infants with localised unresectable NB, a genomic profile characterised by the absence of SCA identifies patients in whom treatment reduction might be possible. These findings will be implemented in a future international trial.

In breast cancer clinical research, an important goal is to analyze how factors are seen to affect the disease process. Meanwhile, the disease progression is not fully modelled using standard analysis since transitions between intermediate events such as local-regional recurrences (LRR) or metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) are not considered. In the present study, the progression of disease was modelled using a multistate model. By this approach, we assessed transitions during the course of the disease and studied prognostic factors for each transition. The model was applied to 6,185 patients with unilateral ductal invasive breast cancer, clinical stage I through III, treated between 1981 and 1988 at the Curie Institute. At first diagnosis, high clinical stage, high histological grade, positive lymph nodes, and age less than 40 years were associated with increased risks of LRR, metastases, or death. Except age, the same factors remained predictive for metastases or death following LRR. Chemotherapy for the first cancer was associated with a decreased risk for developing MCBC. As the time interval from diagnosis of the primary tumor to that of a local or contralateral recurrence increased, the risk of metastases or death decreased. Nodal status for the first tumor and clinical stage for the contralateral tumor increased the risk of metastases or death following MCBC. Conversely, the risk decreased for patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy following MCBC. In conclusion, the multistate model offers us a much more appropriate way to study prognostic factors for each transition in breast cancer disease.

From March 1983 to June 1986, 100 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive either two courses of chemotherapy prior to local therapy (group A), or local therapy alone (group B). Local treatment consisted of primary radiotherapy in all patients. When a poor response was observed after 55 Gy, surgery was performed. The chemotherapy regimen was a combination of cisplatinum, bleomycin, vindesine, and mitomycin C. The response rate to induction chemotherapy (group A) was 50% for the primary tumor (CR: 10% and PR: 40%). At the end of radiotherapy, the overall tumor response rates in the two groups A and B, were 77% and 79% respectively. Complete disappearance of the primary tumor occurred more often than that of the lymph node metastases. The response rate to induction chemotherapy for lymph node metastases was 27.1% (CR: 9% and PR: 18.1%). An initial major response to chemotherapy predicted subsequent efficacy of irradiation on 90% of the cases, while a failure of chemotherapy had no predictive value in this respect. The survival rates in groups A and B were 66.5% vs. 65.1% at 1 year and 35% vs. 46.2% at 2 years. Local disease-free and disease-free intervals were similar in both groups. A Cox's multi-step regression analysis revealed two significant independant prognostic factors: size of primary tumor and nodal status. After adjustment for these factors, the chemotherapy did not seem to improve the effectiveness of the local treatment in terms of loco-regional control and survival.