Vascular access dysfunction in hemodialysis patients has been correlated to low serum vitamin D level in previous studies. Vitamin D deficiency and hepatitis C virus infection have been linked to endothelial cell dysfunction, promoting inflammatory cascade.30 negative - & 30 positive - hepatitis C virus patients on prevalent hemodialysis in Ain Shams University Hospitals, were enrolled in the study. All patients had access blood flow < 800 ml/min. For all patients we performed: complete physical examination, complete blood count, serum ferritin, ESR 1st and 2nd hours, CRP, blood urea, serum creatinine, serum albumin, total and direct bilirubin, alanine transferase, aspartate transferase, prothrombin time, International Normalized Ratio, serum calcium and phosphorus, and serum intact parathyroid hormone. Previous laboratory tests were performed using conventional methods within our hospitals laboratories. Serum vitamin Dlevel was measured by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Access blood flow was measured by Duplex Ultrasound. Vitamin D serum level was < 20 ng/ml within negative and positive groups with no significant difference between them. Vascular access flow was significantly lower within positive patients. Parathyroid hormone, Phosphorus, Prothrombin time, International Normalized Ratio, Alanine - and Aspartate - transferase were significantly higher within positive patients. We deduced that Vitamin D level < 20ng/ml was associated with reduced vascular access blood flow < 800 ml/min, with much more reduced access flow within hepatitis C virus positive patients. [Mona Hosny Abdel Salam, Reem Jan Farid, Mostafa Abdelnassier Abdelgawad and Marwa Salim Youssef Ismail. Correlation of Serum Vitamin D Levels to Vascular Access Dysfunction in Prevalent Hemodialysis.
Background Chronic low-grade inflammation is a feature of chronic kidney disease associated with increased risk of multiple morbidities and mortalities. Dialysis patients lead a sedentary life style which could add to this risk. Aim assessment of the effect of intradialytic exercise IDE on inflammatory markers in prevalent hemodialysis HD patients. Patients and Methods This longitudinal prospective study included 40 adult patients on regular HD, divided equally into 2 groups; Exercise Group (n = 20); received IDE 3 times/week for 3 months and Non-exercise Group (n = 20) matched in age and sex acting as controls. Patients were subjected to full history taking and clinical examination. Physical performance assessment using Short Physical Performance Battery tests (SPBT), Laboratory investigations included; Complete blood picture, C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL6) assessed using Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. All assessments were repeated 3 months after regular IDE. Results At baseline, there was no difference between both groups regarding physical performance or inflammatory markers. After 3 months, SPBT was significantly increased in Exercise group (P < 0.001). Also, both serum CRP and IL-6 levels showed significant decrease in Exercise group compared to baseline (P < 0.001), while no similar change was noticed in non-exercise group. Conclusion The significant decrease in serum CRP and IL-6 levels after 3 months of regular IDE and the improvement in physical performance in exercise group implements that regular IDE exercise training program can improve physical function and inflammation in hemodialysis patients. Further studies on larger number of patients is warranted.
Introduction Inflammation in patients with ESRD undergoing HD is an increasing concern for physicians and has been related to increase the rates of morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, patients with ESRD in conventional HD have frequent infections and a suboptimal response to vaccines; this is probably related to an immune inflammatory disorder associated either with uremia and/or nutritional status. In addition to CRP, which seems to be the most important marker for the identification and control of inflammation in clinical practice, many other markers are also available for the evaluation of inflammatory state. Decreased renal clearance clearly accounts for higher levels of circulating cytokines, although increased production has also been described. Hemodiafiltration has been shown to improve cardio-protection and the immunologic system and reduces infection and mortality compared with conventional HD. A recent study showed that hemodiafiltration compared with conventional HD reduced the risk of mortality in ESRD patients. Analysis of pooled individual participant data from randomized controlled trials has shown survival benefits of high volume-HDF on all-cause mortality and especially cardiovascular mortality rate. The mechanisms that lead to improved outcomes are not clear, but it is thought that HDF may reduce the production of inflammatory mediators through the use of biocompatible dialysers and ultrapure dialysate and also improve clearance of larger molecular weight substances, many of which are associated with oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Objective The aim of this study is to detect, prospectively, the effect of 3 months dialysis with Hemodiafiltration on inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers in comparison to conventional dialysis with high flux dialyzer in stable HD patients. Patients and methods 30 adults aged 20-75 years who were selected from Dialysis Unit, Kobary El-Kobba Military Hospital. 30 male patients known to have chronic kidney disease and are on dialysis with high flux dialyzer more than 3 months were divided into 2 groups:15 Patients are shifted to be on dialysis with HDF and 15 Patients are continued to be on Regular Hemodialysis with high flux dialyzer. Full medical history and clinical examination. Anthropometric measurements and Laboratory investigations including Complete Blood Picture (WBCs, platelets, Hb), Coagulation profile PT, PTT&INR, Liver function tests (ALT, AST, T. Bilirubin and S. Albumin), Lipid profile (Triglycerides, total cholesterol, VLDL), S. creatinine, BUN, Na, K, Uric acid, Total Proteins, Serum Calcium, Serum Phosphorus, PTH, Serum ferritin, High sensitivity CRP (Enzyme- Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)) and IL6 (ELISA). Results The current study was conducted on 30 patients with chronic kidney disease on regular dialysis. The patients were divided into two groups A representing patients on hemodiafiltration (n = 15) and group B representing patients on dialysis with high flux dialyzer (n = 15). A high statistical significant difference (P < 0.01) was found regarding K 4.3±0.6 meq/l in group A while it is 5.2±0.5 meq/l in group B, a high statistical significant difference (P < 0.01) was found regarding phosphorus 4.6±1.0 mg/dl in group A while it is 6.1±0.9 mg/dl in group B and no statistical significant difference (P > 0.05) was found as regard the uric acid. A statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) was found regarding CRP 63.5±40.9 mg/dl in group A while it is 73.4±33.2 mg/dl in group B, a statistical significant difference (P < 0.01) was found regarding IL6 85.3±37.6 mg/dl in group A while it is 156.7±151.9 mg/dl in group B after 3 months and no statistical significant difference (P > 0.05) was found as regard those inflammatory markers before 3 months. A statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) was found regarding CRP. A statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) was found regarding IL6. Conclusion The present study revealed that there was no significant change in CRP and IL6 in patients on HDF compared to patients undergoing hemodialysis with high flux dialyzer before 3 months but there was a significant decrease in CRP and IL6 in patients on HDF compared to patients undergoing hemodialysis with high flux dialyzer after 3 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.