Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) can be life-threatening owing to a variety of complications, and it is managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although Stanford type-B AAS may involve hypoxemia, its predictors are not yet clearly understood. We studied clinical factors and imaging parameters for predicting hypoxemia after the onset of type-B AAS. We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with type-B AAS in our hospital between January 2012 and April 2020. We defined hypoxemia as PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 within 7 days after AAS onset and used logistic regression analysis to evaluate prognostic factors for hypoxemia. We analyzed 224 consecutive patients (140 males, mean age 70 ± 14 years) from a total cohort of 267 patients. Among these, 53 (23.7%) had hypoxemia. The hypoxemia group had longer ICU and hospital stays compared with the non-hypoxemia group (median 20 vs. 16 days, respectively; p = 0.039 and median 7 vs. 5 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–6.63; p = 0.014), obesity (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.13–4.97; p = 0.023), patent false lumen (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.09–4.99; p = 0.029), and high D-dimer level (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00–1.02; p = 0.047) were independently associated with hypoxemia by multivariate logistic analysis. This study showed a significant difference in duration of ICU and hospital stays between patients with and without hypoxemia. Furthermore, male sex, obesity, patent false lumen, and high D-dimer level may be significantly associated with hypoxemia in patients with type-B AAS.

An emerging therapeutic modality, ECPELLA, which combines a transvalvular microaxial left ventricular (LV) assist device, Impella, and venoarterial membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO), has been applied for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. During ECPELLA support, VA‐ECMO increases the LV load, whereas the Impella reduces the LV load. Studies reported that coronary perfusion is influenced by LV unloading conditions, and the effective degree of LV unloading to increase the coronary perfusion on ECPELLA support remains to be determined. Here, we reported a cardiogenic shock case whose coronary arterial flow was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography during ECPELLA support. The left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) peak blood flow velocity and the velocity time integral (VTI) were not significantly increased when blood was ejected from the LV (partial LV unloading). When the LV blood ejection was completely bypassed by Impella confirmed by non‐pulsatile aortic pressure with significantly reduced LV pressure with no aortic valve opening (LV uncoupling: no blood ejection from the LV), both peak velocity and VTI of the LAD were markedly increased and the blood flow became continuous throughout the cardiac cycle. Our case suggests that the coronary arterial flow in the injured myocardium is sensitive to degrees of LV unloading on ECPELLA support.

Background Extracorporeal Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (E-CPR) is an effective tool for patients with refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Since VA-ECMO provides strong afterload, IABP is often used to increase left ventricular load. Recently, in Japan, the effectiveness of VA-ECMO in combination with IMPELLA, a forward flow mechanical circulatory support device (ECPELLA) is gaining attention. Purpose We investigated usefulness of ECPELLA in patients with refractory CA. Method We reviewed 133 patients that had E-CPR from January 2012 through January 2020 {mean age: 67±15 years, male 65%, Out of hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) 35%, Acute coronary Syndrome (ACS) 54%}. We divided these patients into ECMO with IMPELLA (ECPELLA group), ECMO with IABP (IABP group) and ECMO alone (ECMO alone group). The primary endpoint is 30-day survival and good neurological prognosis defined as CPC (cerebral performance categories) 1 or 2. Result During the study period, of the 133 patients, there were 20 in the ECPELLA group, 78 in the IABP group, 35 in the ECMO alone group. There were no significant differences in age in all three groups. There were more males, shockable rhythm, OHCA and ACS in the ECPELLA and IABP groups compared to the ECMO alone group. But there was no significant difference between the ECPELLA and IABP groups. Compared with other groups, ECPELLA had the shortest time from cardiac arrest to ECMO placement. Regarding endpoints, the rate of 30-day survival and favorable neurological prognosis were higher in the ECPELLA group, followed by the IABP group and then the ECMO alone group. (ECPELLA: 55% vs. IABP: 23% vs. ECMO alone: 9%; P=0.0009, ECPELLA: 35% vs. IABP: 13% vs. ECMO alone: 9%; P=0.04) Next, Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to analyze 30-day all-cause mortality. The ECPELLA group had a significantly higher survival rate (P=0.01 by log-rank test). Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis including the age, OHCA, shockable rhythm, ACS, Collapse-to-ECMO under 60 min revealed that the age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 (10 years increase), 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–1.53, P=0.004) and Collapse-to-ECMO under 60 min (HR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.21–0.68, P=0.001) or ECPELLA (HR, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.20–0.694, P=0.03) were significantly associated with mortality. Conclusion ECPELLA used with E-CPR is an effective tool to improve mortality and neurologic status. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

The combination of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella, referred to as ECPELLA, is a powerful transient mechanical circulatory support for patients with severe cardiogenic shock (CS). During ECPELLA support, VA-ECMO loads the left ventricle (LV) and Impella unloads the LV. Therefore, evaluating the degree of LV unloading during ECPELLA may be a prerequisite to protect the injured myocardium. Here we report a patient with CS due to an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction in which the degree of LV unloading on ECPELLA was confirmed by direct LV pressure (LVP) measurement. After the percutaneous coronary intervention for the right coronary artery on ECPELLA, the aortic pressure became nonpulsatile and the peak systolic LVP was reduced at approximately 10 mmHg with 20 mA of the Impella motor current (MC) amplitude, which we referred to as the total LV unloading condition. We maintained the condition in the early phase of ECPELLA by monitoring the Impella MC amplitude at 20 mA and less with nonpulsatile aortic pressure. The patient was successfully weaned off VA-ECMO on day 3, and Impella was explanted on day 8. Prior to the Impella explant, the Impella MC amplitude increased more than 100 mA and the estimated pressure gradient between the aortic pressure and LVP was well matched with the directly measured LVP. In this case, the patient was successfully treated by ECPELLA with the total LV unloading condition, and we showed that the degree of LV unloading on ECPELLA can be estimated from the aortic pressure and Impella MC amplitude at given Impella flows.

A 64-year-old man was transported to the emergency room (ER) with chest pain and respiratory distress. The patient exhibited hypoxia and restlessness in the ER and subsequently experienced cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved within several minutes by conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The patient was diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial