Background: Ultrafiltration is an alternative strategy to diuretic therapy for the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Little is known about the efficacy and safety of peritoneal dialysis in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by acute cardiorenal syndrome. Methods: We randomly assigned a total of 88 patients with type 1 acute cardiorenal syndrome to a strategy of ultrafiltration therapy (44 patients) or tidal peritoneal dialysis (44 patients). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the serum creatinine level and left ventricular function represented as ejection fraction, as assessed 72 and 120 h after random assignment. Patients were followed for 90 days after discharge from the hospital. Results: Ultrafiltration therapy was inferior to tidal peritoneal dialysis therapy with respect to the primary endpoint of the change in the serum creatinine levels at 72 and 120 h ( p = 0.041) and ejection fraction at 72 and 120 h after enrollment ( p = 0.044 and p = 0.032), owing to both an increase in the creatinine level in the ultrafiltration therapy group and a decrease in its level in the tidal peritoneal dialysis group. At 120 h, the mean change in the creatinine level was 1.4 ± 0.5 mg/dL in the ultrafiltration therapy group, as compared with 2.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL in the tidal peritoneal dialysis group ( p = 0.023). At 72 and 120 h, there was a significant difference in weight loss between patients in the ultrafiltration therapy group and those in the tidal peritoneal dialysis group ( p = 0.025). Net fluid loss was also greater in tidal peritoneal dialysis patients ( p = 0.018). Adverse events were more observed in the ultrafiltration therapy group ( p = 0.007). At 90 days post-discharge, tidal peritoneal dialysis patients had fewer rehospitalization for heart failure (14.3% vs 32.5%, p = 0.022). Conclusion: Tidal peritoneal dialysis is a safe and effective means for removing toxins and large quantities of excess fluid from patients with intractable heart failure. In patients with cardiorenal syndrome type 1, the use of tidal peritoneal dialysis was superior to ultrafiltration therapy for the preservation of renal function, improvement of cardiac function, and net fluid loss. Ultrafiltration therapy was associated with a higher rate of adverse events.

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated an association between appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and mortality in clinical trials. The effect of shock burden on heart failure and mortality has not been previously studied in a large populationbased cohort. Methods: The cohort was derived using a comprehensive prospective ICD registry in the province of Nova Scotia with a mean follow-up of 4 AE 2.3 years. With the use of time-varying analysis, the relationship among shock burden, mortality, and heart failure hospitalization was determined. Results: A total of 776 patients (mean age of 64.8 years) were included in the study, of whom 37% received appropriate therapy during follow-up. A single ICD shock did not confer an increased mortality risk compared with no therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.79; P ¼ 0.3), but mortality risk was significantly increased with ! 2 shocks (HR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.04-5.09; Methods Study populationThis was a prospective cohort study of all patients receiving an ICD in the province of Nova Scotia from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013. This study was approved by the institutional ethics board. Data for patients who underwent ICD implantation before 2006 were collected in a retrospective manner. Data on all other patients were collected from a CJC Open 1 (2019) 161e167

No abstract

BackgroundEstablishment of thromboembolism prevention remains a challenge despite the widespread consensus that thromboprophylaxis safely reduces patient morbidity and mortality. Dabigatran is a nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) which reduces the risk of thromboembolism. Proper dosing is important to achieve the maximum prophylactic benefit with a maintained safety profile.ObjectiveTo evaluate the appropriateness of dabigatran dosing for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of adults with NVAF. The data were collected from the electronic filing system of the hospital. Patients receiving dabigatran therapy were divided into two treatment groups according to the dose of dabigatran received. The indications for dabigatran as an oral direct anticoagulant, including age, risk of bleeding, creatinine clearance (CrCl), were collected. Appropriateness of dose reduction included any of the following factors: HAS-BLED score >2 points, age ≥75 years, or CrCl of 30–50 mL/min. The two groups were evaluated according to dose appropriateness.ResultsDabigatran dose of 110 mg was found to be inappropriately low in a large number of patients (31.3%). Multivariate regression analysis showed significant association of age and dose appropriateness (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study revealed inappropriate prescription of reduced doses of dabigatran in a large number of patients. Age was identified as the main driving factor for underdosing. Physicians’ and pharmacists’ awareness regarding this type of high-risk medication should be improved to ensure appropriate and safe use of this commonly used drug.