Background: Implementation and upscale of effective malaria vector control strategies necessitates understanding the multi-factorial aspects of transmission patterns. The primary aims of this study are to determine the vector composition, biting rates, trophic preference, and the overall importance of distinguishing outdoor versus indoor malaria transmission through a study at two communities in rural Mali. Methods: Mosquito collection was carried out between July 2012 and June 2016 at two rural Mali communities (Dangassa and Koïla Bamanan) using pyrethrum spray-catch and human landing catch approaches at both indoor and outdoor locations. Species of Anopheles (An.) gambiae complex were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Enzyme-Linked -Immuno-Sorbent Assay (ELISA) were used to determine the origin of mosquito blood meals and presence of Plasmodium (P.) falciparum sporozoite infections.Results: A total of 11,237 An. gambiae (s.l.) were collected during the study period (5,239 and 5,998 from the Dangassa and Koïla Bamanan sites, respectively). Of the 679 identified by PCR in Dangassa, An. coluzzii was the predominant species with 91.4% of the catch followed by An. gambiae (8.0%) and An. arabiensis (0.6%). At the same time in Koïla Bamanan, of 623 An. gambiae s.l., An. coluzzii accounted for 99% of the catch, An. arabiensis 0.8% and An. gambiae 0.2%. Human Blood Index (HBI) measures were significantly higher in Dangassa (79.4%; 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI) [77.4, 81.4]) than in Koïla Bamanan (15.9%; 95% BCI [14.7, 17.1]). The human biting rates were higher during the second half of the night at both sites. In Dangassa, the sporozoite rate was comparable between outdoor and indoor mosquito collections. For outdoor collections, the sporozoite positive rate was 3.6% (95% BCI [2.1-4.3]) and indoor collections were 3.1% (95% BCI [2.4-5.0]). In Koïla Bamanan, the sporozoite rate was higher indoors at 4.3% (95% BCI [2.7-6.3]) compared with outdoors at 2.4% (95% BCI [1.1- 4.2]). In Dangassa, corrected entomological inoculation rates (cEIRs) using HBI were 13.74 [95% BCI: 9.21—19.14] infective bites/person/month (ib/p/m) at indoor, and 18.66 [95% BCI 12.55—25.81] ib/p/m at outdoor. For Koïla Bamanan, cEIRs were 1.57 [95% BCI 2.34 —2.72] ib/p/m and 0.94 [95% BCI 0.43—1.64] ib/p/m for indoor and outdoor, respectively. EIRs were significantly higher at the Dangassa site than the Koïla Bamanan site.Conclusion: The findings in this work may indicate the occurrence of active, outdoor residual malaria transmission is comparable to indoor transmission in some geographic settings. The high outdoor transmission patterns observed here highlight the need for additional strategies to combat outdoor malaria transmission to complement traditional indoor preventive approaches such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) which typically focus on resting mosquitoes.
Background: Following mosquito vector resistance to both pyrethroid and carbamates, organophosphate (pirimiphos-methyl) was used for the Indoor Residual Spray campaigns performed in 2015 to 2016 in the district of Koulikoro. In this context, we assessed the effect of IRS on malaria transmission by comparing entomological indices in two localities: Koulikoro (LLINs+IRS), and Banamba (LLINs -only) districts. Methods: The study was conducted in two villages of each district (Koulikoro and Banamba). Pyrethrum spray catches and entry window trapping were used to collect mosquitoes on a monthly basis. WHO tube tests were carried out to assess mosquito susceptibility to insecticides. Mosquitoes were identified to species level by PCR and their infection to P. falciparum was detected by ELISA. Results: An. coluzii was the most frequent species. Its density was rainfall dependent in the no-IRS area, and almost independent in the IRS area. The infection rate (IR) in the no-IRS area was 0.96%, while it was null in the IRS area. In the no-IRS area, the entomological inoculation rates (EIR) was 0.21 infective bites /person month with a peak in September. High resistance to pyrethroids and carbamates and susceptibility to organophosphates was observed at all sites. Conclusion: The introduction of pirimiphos-methyl based IRS in the area resulted to a significant decrease in malaria transmission. An.gambiae s.l., the main malaria vector of the area, was resistant to pyrethroids and carbamates, and remained susceptible to the organophosphates.
Background:Vector control relies heavily on Long-lasting insecticidal nets ( (LLINs) and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) in selected districts in Mali including Koulikoro district. As part of strengthening vector control strategies in the district, IRS was initiated by the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) with the support of the US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) since 2008. LLINs coverage was 93.3% and 98.2% for IRS in Koulikoro, the only district of the region where IRS was supported by PMI. Following mosquito vector resistance to both pyrethroid and carbamates, organophosphate (pirimiphos-methyl) was used for the IRS campaigns of 2015 and 2016 in the district of Koulikoro. In this study, we assessed the effect of IRS on malaria transmission by comparing entomological indices in of the district of Koulikoro, where IRS was implemented and its neighbored district of Banamba, where IRS had never been implemented. Methods:The study was conducted in two villages of each district (Koulikoro and Banamba). Pyrethrum spray catches and entry window trapping were used to collect mosquitoes on a monthly basis. WHO tube tests were carried out to assess mosquito susceptibility to insecticides. Mosquitoes were identified to species level by PCR and their infection to P. falciparum was detected by ELISA.Results:Of the 527 specimens identified, An. coluzzii was the most frequent species (95%) followed by An. gambiae (4%) and An. arabiensis (1%). Its density was rainfall dependent in the no-IRS area, and almost independent in the IRS area. The infection rate (IR) in the no-IRS area was 0.96%, while it was null in the IRS area. In the no-IRS area, the entomological inoculation rates (EIR) was 0.21 infective bites /person month with a peak in September. High resistance to pyrethroids and carbamates and susceptibility to organophosphates was observed at all sites.Conclusion:The introduction of pirimiphos-methyl based IRS in the area resulted in a significant decrease in malaria transmission. An.gambiae s.l., the main malaria vector of the area, was resistant to pyrethroids and carbamates, and remained susceptible to the organophosphates.
Background: Following vectors resistance to both pyrethroid and carbamates, organophosphate (pirimiphos-methyl) was used in the Indoor Residual Spray campaigns of 2015 to 2016 in the district of Koulikoro. In this context, we assessed the effect of IRS on malaria transmission by comparing entomological indices in two localities: Koulikoro (LLINs+IRS), and Banamba (LLINs -only) districts. Methods: The study was conducted in two villages of each of Koulikoro and Banamba in 2016. Pyrethroid spray catch and entry window trapping where used to collect mosquitoes monthly WHO bioassay test was used to assess mosquito’s susceptibility to insecticides. Mosquitoes were identified into species by PCR and the infection rate using ELISA. Results: An. coluzii was by far the most frequent species. Its density was rainfall dependent in no-IRS area, and almost independent in IRS area. The IR in the no-IRS area was 1.24%, while in the IRS area, we could not detect infection. In the no-IRS area, the EIR was 0.21 infective bites /person month with the peak in September. High resistance to pyrethroids and carbamates and susceptibility to organophosphates was observed in all sites. Conclusion: A big randomized study is needed to better estimate the added value of the IRS in an integrated malaria control strategy. Key words: Mali, IRS, Long-lasting insecticidal nets, insecticide resistance, transmission.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.