Background: Identifying effective methods for safeguarding the efficient functioning of the healthcare system contributes significantly towards establishing a successful healthcare organization. Consequently, quality management programs are currently being implemented in healthcare as a vital strategy for patient care. Quality management encompasses protocols and guidelines in decision-making and in the evaluation of processes and treatment flowcharts, data analysis and health indicators, and addresses improvement in the interaction between different health professionals. Qualifying health professionals to perform quality management has represented a barrier to implementing a well-structured management system. Indeed, the pathway to qualifying health managers is often poorly outlined, with clear gaps in the definition of their competencies, training and career plans. Therefore, studies and education-related actions aimed at qualifying health professionals in management are vital if health services of excellence are to be established. The present study aimed to plan, develop, implement and evaluate a management specialization course in oncology using blended learning. Methods: Following approval by the institution's internal review board, the study was conducted at the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP). The Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE) model was used to plan, develop, implement and evaluate the course. Data were collected as the course participants who had concluded all the modules evaluated the program. Results: A management course in oncology, consisting of ten sequential modules, was developed and implemented between March 2018 and February 2019. The course consisted of monthly face-to-face encounters, each with 12 h of activities, and distance education using a virtual learning environment. Each module was presented by a specialist on the subject in question. After the end-of-course conclusion work had already been handed in and evaluated by the tutors, the participants completed a form to assess the course using Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model. Conclusions: A management course in oncology was developed using the ADDIE model. A high degree of satisfaction was found among the participants regarding improvements in their management skills and their professional behavior. The expectation is that this initiative will ultimately improve healthcare and reduce costs, as well as encourage further innovative educational actions for health professionals.

Introdução: O Programa Mais Médicos (PMM) foi criado com a finalidade de prover médicos para as regiões mais necessitadas, considerando-se que a presença do médico na Atenção Básica atua em demandas como promoção e vigilância da saúde, prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento de doenças. Objetivo: Objetivou-se avaliar a efetividade do PMM em Pernambuco utilizando internamentos e óbitos por hipertensão arterial (HA) e diabete mellitus (DM) como condições traçadoras. Métodos: Estudo de corte transversal, do tipo antes e depois, nos períodos 2011–2013 e 2014–2016. Os dados foram obtidos do Sistema de Informação Hospitalar do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS) do Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS), considerando o estado e suas mesorregiões. Resultados: Foi observada redução do número de internamentos no estado, 27% por HA e 26% por DM. Por HA, houve queda nos internamentos de 58% no Sertão, maior se por urgência. Os óbitos por HA diminuíram em quase todas as mesorregiões, e no estado houve queda de 41%; exceção para a Região Metropolitana do Recife, que aumentou o percentual. Por DM, a redução dos internamentos foi menor se comparada à daqueles por HA, e houve aumento dos internamentos por urgência na Zona da Mata e no Sertão do São Francisco. Os óbitos por DM reduziram em todas as mesorregiões, totalizando 42% no estado. Conclusões: O PMM mostrou-se efetivo na redução de internamentos e óbitos por HA e DM em Pernambuco, caracterizando-se como importante programa para o fortalecimento da Atenção Básica, especialmente para a redução de complicações de condições sensíveis. Destaca-se a necessidade do profissional médico para a ampliação da assistência, principalmente em regiões carentes e desprovidas de médicos.

e13628 Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most incident and the most deadly among women from the Northeast’S Brazil and RECIFE-Pernambuco and the third most incident in Brazil. The occurrence of CC expresses a reality of inequality and inequity and should be understood not only as an oncological indicator, but essentially as an indicator of social vulnerability and health care needs. Its distribution occurs heterogeneously. Methods: Determine the geolocation of areas of greatest risk of occurrence of SC from the social and health determinants Considering the high incidence and mortality related to cervical cancer between 2006-2015, in the city of Recife, we used the spatialization technique to identify the most vulnerable territories for our intervention in the city of Recife. Results: 3,844 Cervical Cancer notifications AND 276 OBITUATIONS registered in the period 2006-2015 and the number of deaths in the period from 2009 to 2018, as a result, there are five areas of high influence. from spatialization, the heat zone generated by the 47 deaths that occurred in the north of the city of Recife WAS DETERMANED. Regarding the cytopathological supply, the ratio in 2018 was 0.37, being below the state average, which is 0.41. With a deficit of 45,041 screening cytopathological exams in the age group 25-64 years.the III Health Region was identified, based on the analysis of information from the State Health Secretary, which shows to be one of the areas of great social vulnerability, since 63% of the 22 municipalities that make up this health region and its population is in extreme poverty, according to IBGE (2010). Conclusions: The occurrence of deaths and new cases of cervical cancer in the city of Recife occurs geographically unequally and is associated with indicators of social vulnerability. IS IT POSSIBLE to identify a priority region to intensify public actions for prevention and early diagnosis. A challenging scenario has been found and must be actively addressed.

No abstract

e18571 Background: cervical cancer (CC) reveals regional and social inequalities and should be understood not only as an oncological indicator, but essentially as an indicator of social vulnerability and health care needs.CC is the second most incident and the most deadly among women from the Northeast’S Brazil and the third most incident in Brazil Although the HPV vaccine coverage and the Pap smear test are available through the Brazilian public health system, the coverage of the target population is low. objective: Verify the conditions of access/use of the health system by women with cervical cancer (CC) and their families. Methods: Cross-sectional study involving cancer patients admitted to IMIP between 2016 and 2019. The variable data were related to the sociodemographic profile, preventive examination, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and the influence of the diagnosis of CC on the search for preventive and screening measures by women's family members. Results: Out of the 285 participants,between 9-21 years old and 101 between 25-69 years old. Of the patients studied,55,8% lives urban area. It has a higher performance of biopsies in the public sector (59,5%). The sociodemographic analysis highlights the non-white race (78,2%) and only 6,8% with complete high school. The knowledge about performing the Pap smear reached 88,9% and the disinformation about the HPV reached 44,4%.the school was the largest source of information about the HPV vaccine (30,6%). Related to the influence of cancer, 62,2% said that young family members underwent HPV vaccination and 82,2% related their diagnosis to search for preventive in family members over 25 years old. a much higher percentage than vaccination coverage and preventive exam in the study region report that the diagnosis of cancer influenced the decision to vaccinate (42%) and update the pap test (69%). about 30% of patients had never taken the pap test. the early start (15 - 19y) of the pap test was not significant for the periodic performance of the pap test. 46% reported the lack of information about the importance of the exam as a reason for not performing it and 34% reported fear. conclusion :Strengthening educational activities and offering vaccines against HPV and Pap smears in the diagnosis of a case of cervical cancer can be an opportunity to expand the coverage of preventive measures more effectively among people close to the patient and her community, which cannot be missed. The school was an important source of information about the HPV vaccine and should be directly involved in this fight.Reducing an inequality cycle.