Sentiment analysis automatically evaluates people's opinions of products or services. It is an emerging research area with promising advancements in high-resource languages such as Indo-European languages (e.g. English). However, the same cannot be said for languages with limited resources. In this study, we evaluate multilingual sentiment analysis (MSA) techniques for under-resourced languages and the use of high-resourced languages to develop resources for MSA in low-resource languages, with the ultimate goal of identifying appropriate strategies for future MSA investigations. We report over 35 studies with different languages demonstrating an interest in developing MSA models for under-resourced languages in a multilingual context. Furthermore, we illustrate the drawbacks of each strategy used for the MSA task. Our focus is critically comparing MSA methods and employed datasets and identifying research gaps. Our comparative analysis study contributes to theoretical literature reviews with complete coverage of MSA studies from 2008 to date. Furthermore, we demonstrate how MSA studies have grown tremendously. Finally, because most studies propose MSA methods based on deep learning approaches, we offer a deep learning framework for MSA that does not rely on machine translation systems. According to the metaanalysis (PRISMA) protocol of this literature review, we found that, in general, just over 60% of the studies have used deep learning frameworks, which significantly improved the MSA performance. Therefore, deep learning methods are recommended for the development of MSA for under-resourced languages.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.