Introduction: Meconium staining amniotic fluid is associated with lots of adverseoutcome and has long been considered to be a bad predictor of fetal outcome.Objective: This prospective observational study was undertaken to find out immediatefetal outcome in meconium stained liquor.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecologydepartment of Dhaka National Medical Collage Hospital from July to December 2008.The pregnant women with yellow, brown and thinly stained amniotic fluid in labour withgestational age 37 completed weeks were enrolled in the study. Their babies weretaken as case and followed upto 7 days after delivery in National Medical CollageHospital and in Dhaka Shishu Hospital after admission when required. Babies bornwithout meconium stained liquor were taken as a control.Results: Total 80 cases were enrolled in the study as case and 80 cases wereenrolled as control. Mean gestational age was 39.3±1.5 weeks in cases and 38.5±1.3weeks in control. There was 13.8% pregnancy induced hypertension in case groupand 3.8% in control group. Pre-eclampsia were present 10% in case group and 1.1%in control group (p<0.05). Caesarean deliveries were high (75%) in cases and it wasmuch higher with thick meconium (75%) as compared to the thin meconium (25%,p<0.001). Apgar scores in first minute and fifth minute were also low in cases. Birthasphyxia was more in cases (20%). Meconium Aspiration syndrome (25%) andConvulsion (3.8%) were developed only in cases. Admission in neonatal ward wasmore (22.5%) in cases (p<0.05) as compared to control. Neonatal mortality was high(3.8%) in cases than control (1.3%).Conclusion: Meconium stained amniotic fluid were associated with higher rate ofcaesarian delivery, increased need for neonatal resuscitation, increased rate of birthasphyxia with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome,hospital admission and mortality.Key words: Meconium stained liquor; foetal outcome.DOI: 10.3329/bjch.v33i2.5675Bangladesh Journal of Child Health 2009; Vol.33(2): 41-45

Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether short term bladder catheterization would be more beneficial than the routinely practiced long term catheterization after vaginal hysterectomy for prolapsed uterus.  Materials and methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Dhaka National Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to January 2011. A total of 106 women were included in this study. They were randomized into short term catheterization group where transurethral catheter was removed after 24 hours of surgery and long term catheterization group where catheter was removed on 3rd post operative day.  Result: Mean time of first voiding after removal of catheter was almost equal in both groups (2.82±1.42 hours and 2.74±1.52 hours). Duration of catheter did not affect the duration of first voiding time after removal of catheter (P>0.05). None of the women had residual volume of urine >200 ml in both groups. Mean residual volume is significantly high in long term catheterization group (P<0.05). Urinary tract infection was also significantly high in long term catheterization group (P<0.05) and majority of the infection were caused by E. coli.  Conclusion: Short term catheterization is more beneficial in terms of lower incidence of urinary tract infection and prevention of bladder over filling as compared to long term catheterization after vaginal prolapsed surgery. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jdnmch.v18i2.16012 J. Dhaka National Med. Coll. Hos. 2012; 18 (02): 4-8