Diabetes is associated with increased skeletal fragility, despite higher bone mineral density (BMD). Alternative measures are necessary to more accurately determine fracture risk in individuals with diabetes. Therefore, we aimed to describe the relationship between trabecular bone score (TBS) and normoglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes and determine whether TBS-adjusted FRAX (Aus) score differed between these groups. This study included 555 men (68.7 ± 12.2 years) and 514 women (62.0 ± 12.0 years), enrolled in the observational Geelong Osteoporosis Study. IFG was considered as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 5.5 mmol/L and diabetes as FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, with the use of antihyperglycaemic medication and/or self-report. Using multivariable regression, the relationship between groups and TBS was determined. Men and women (all ages) with diabetes had lower mean TBS compared to those with normoglycaemia, in models adjusted for age, height and weight/waist circumference (all p < 0.05). Men with IFG had lower mean TBS in the age-adjusted models only (all p < 0.05). The addition of TBS to the FRAX score improved the discrimination between glycaemia groups, particularly for younger women (< 65 years). There was no difference in TBS detected between normoglycaemia and IFG; however, those with diabetes had lower TBS. Thus, the increased fracture risk in men and women with diabetes may be a result of BMD-independent bone deterioration. TBS adjustment of FRAX scores may be useful for younger women (< 65 years) with diabetes. This suggests that halting or reversing progression from IFG to diabetes could be important to prevent skeletal fragility in diabetes.

Background: Deafness is the hidden disability of childhood, and leads to poor educational and employment prospects. There is little published information on deafness in Pakistan. Profound hearing impairment is more prevalent in countries where consanguineous marriages are common, such as Pakistan. This study aimed to assess causes of childhood deafness and association with parental consanguinity, within deaf and hearing children in the Peshawar district of Pukhtoonkhwa Province, Pakistan.Methods: One hundred and forty deaf children were identified from two schools for deaf children within the Peshawar district. These children were assessed via audiology, otoscopic examination, case note review and parental history, in order to attempt to ascertain the cause of their deafness. Two hundred and twenty-one attendees at a local immunisation clinic (taken as representative of the local childhood population) were also screened for hearing impairment. Parents of both groups of children were assessed by interview and questionnaire in order to ascertain the mother and father's family relationship (i.e. whether cousins or unrelated).Results: Of the 140 deaf school pupils, 92.1 per cent were profoundly hearing impaired and 7.9 per cent were severely hearing impaired. All these children had bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A possible cause of deafness was identified in only six of these children. Parental consanguinity (i.e. first or second cousins) was established for 86.4 per cent of deaf school pupils and 59.7 per cent of immunisation clinic attendees. None of the control children were identified as having a hearing problem.Conclusion: The prevalence of parental consanguinity was significantly higher in deaf children compared with non-hearing impaired children. However, the study also confirmed a high rate of consanguinity within the general Peshawar community. In this setting, prevention of consanguineous unions is the only means of reducing levels of congenital hearing impairment. The current levels of hearing disability represent both a prominent public health problem and an important, potentially preventable childhood disability.

Crude incidence rates varied by location. Given that a high proportion of patients had acute hospital care of ≤14days, and accessibility and SES were associated with hip fracture rates, these results can inform policy and provide a model for other groups to conduct similar research in their local environment.

Independent of small between-LGA differences in utilisation, and in contrast to the expected greater prevalence of osteoarthritis in disadvantaged populations, we report greater TKR and THR in more advantaged groups. Further research should investigate whether more advantaged populations may be over-serviced.

We report that compared with normoglycaemia, post-menopausal women (non-obese and obese) with diabetes had higher lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD). Femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) was higher in obese postmenopausal women with diabetes. Only non-obese post-menopausal women with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) had a higher LSBMD than normoglycaemia. No other associations with IFG were observed. Introduction Individuals with diabetes have a higher or normal bone mineral density (BMD) compared with those without diabetes. However, paradoxically, they also have a higher fracture risk. It is not clear whether those with IFG also have altered BMD. This study aimed to determine whether individuals with IFG have elevated or normal BMD. Methods Women (n = 858) and men (n = 970) (aged 20-80 years) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 5.5-6.9 mmol/L and diabetes as FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, use of antihyperglycaemic medication and/or self-report. Using multivariable linear regression, the relationships between glycaemia and BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were examined, and adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), and other variables. In women, two interaction terms were identified: menopause × glycaemia and BMI × glycaemia, and thus, the analyses were stratified by menopause and obesity status (BMI cut point ≥ 30 kg/m 2). Results There were no associations between glycaemic status and BMD for pre-menopausal women. For non-obese postmenopausal women, there was no association between FNBMD and glycaemic status, but women with IFG or diabetes had higher LSBMD than those with normoglycaemia (7.1% and 9.7%, respectively, both p < 0.01). Obese post-menopausal women with diabetes had a higher FNBMD (8.8%, p = 0.008) and LSBMD (12.2%, p < 0.001), but those with IFG were not different from the normoglycaemia group. There were no associations detected between glycaemic status and BMD in men. Conclusions In this study, we report that compared with normoglycaemia, post-menopausal women (non-obese and obese) with diabetes had higher LSBMD. FNBMD was higher in obese post-menopausal women with diabetes. Only non-obese postmenopausal women with IFG had a higher LSBMD than normoglycaemia. No other associations with IFG were observed.