<abstract> <p>Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterised by production of autoantibodies against platelet surface antigens. Recent studies have demonstrated a paramount association of ITP and <italic>Helicobacter pylori (H-pylori)</italic> infection with significant rise in platelet count following <italic>H-pylori</italic> eradication therapy. The <italic>H-pylori</italic> infection induced ITP is validated by many proposed mechanisms such as molecular mimicry due to production of autoantibodies against <italic>H-pylori</italic> surface virulent factors (CagA) and cross reactivity of these antibodies with platelet surface antigens (GP IIb/IIIa, GP Ib/IX, and GP Ia/IIa), phagocytic perturbation due to enhanced phagocytic activity of monocytes, enhanced dendritic cell numbers and response, platelets aggregation due to presence of anti- <italic>H-pylori</italic> IgG and von Willebrand factor (vWf) and finally host immune response against <italic>H-pylori</italic> virulent factors CagA and VacA leading to ITP. The effectiveness of <italic>H-pylori</italic> eradication therapy has also been demonstrated with platelet count being used as a predictive factor for assessment of treatment efficacy. Out of 201 patients 118 were responding to the triple therapy and remaining 83 patients were non-responders, showing the response rate of 58.7%. Out of 118 responders 69 patients were showing complete response (CR) and 49 were showing partial response (PR) to the <italic>H-pylori</italic> eradication therapy. However, more studies are required to elucidate this association and treatment efficacy.</p> </abstract>

Background and objectiveThe ambiguous nature and high infectivity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have caused soaring morbidity and mortality worldwide. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is preferred for detecting COVID-19. However, its poor sensitivity and the emerging use of high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan for disease severity make the use of RT-PCR quite obsolete. In light of this, our study aimed to explore the beneficial role of HRCT and compare the HRCT findings across various patient demographics and parameters. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 100 patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. All patients underwent a chest HRCT scan preceded by RT-PCR testing. We used the CT severity score (CTSS) of the chest to calculate disease severity. Demographical data and results of radiological findings were tabulated and compared across RT-PCR positivity, age, and gender. Independent samples t-test and chi-square test were used to analyze the data. ResultsGlass ground opacity was the most prevalent finding in 99% of the patients, followed by lymph node involvement, consolidation, and crazy-paving pattern. Pleural effusion was observed in only 10% of the patients while pericardial effusion and hiatal hernia were present in 5%. In RT-PCR-positive patients, the posterior basal segment of the lower lobe of the right and left lungs were found to be dominantly involved; however, the upper and middle lobes of the right lung were more commonly involved than the left lung. The mean CTSS was significantly higher in patients aged above 50 years (p<0.001). The mean CTSS of RT-PCRnegative patients was higher than that of p=0.537). ConclusionRT-PCR has a limited role in the diagnosis of COVID-19. The HRCT scan can detect typical COVID-19 findings even in patients with negative RT-PCR results. Moreover, the use of HRCT scan in determining the disease severity and extent of lung damage can lead to a better assessment of critically ill patients.