This experimental model of apnea shows a reproducible incidence of AF. After neural ablation of the RPA GP or autonomic blockade, AF inducibility was significantly inhibited.
Background-The mechanism(s) for acute changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria during rapid pacing induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is not completely understood. We sought to evaluate the contribution of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system in acute atrial electrical remodeling and AF induced by 6-hour rapid atrial pacing. Methods and Results-Continuous rapid pacing (1200 bpm, 2ϫ threshold [TH]) was performed at the left atrial appendage. Group 1 (nϭ7) underwent 6-hour pacing immediately followed by ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation; group 2 (nϭ7) underwent GP ablation immediately followed by 6-hour pacing; and group 3 (nϭ4) underwent administration of autonomic blockers, atropine (1 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.6 mg/kg) immediately followed by 6-hour pacing. The effective refractory period (ERP) and window of vulnerability (WOV, in milliseconds), ie, the difference between the longest and the shortest coupling interval of the premature stimulus that induced AF, were measured at 2ϫTH and 10ϫTH at the left atrium, right atrium, and pulmonary veins every hour before and after GP ablation or autonomic blockade. In group 1, ERP was markedly shortened in the first 2 hours and then stabilized both at 2ϫTH and 10ϫTH; however, WOV was progressively widened throughout the 6-hour period. After GP ablation, ERP was significantly longer than before ablation and AF could not be induced (WOVϭ0) at either 2ϫTH or 10ϫTH. In groups 2 and 3, rapid atrial pacing failed to shorten the ERP. AF could not be induced in 6 of 7 dogs in group 2 and all 4 dogs in group 3 during the 6-hour pacing period.
Conclusion-The
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.