IntroductionMediastinal lymphadenopathy in cancer patients can be of both malignant and non-malignant (including infectious) etiology. Tuberculosis (TB) is an important differential in this regard, particularly in regions with high TB endemicity. ObjectivesTo determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis (MTBLA) in cancer patients of a TB-endemic region, and the diagnostic role of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in such patients, utilizing both cytopathological and microbiological parameters for diagnosing TB. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the relevant clinical data of all cancer patients diagnosed with MTBLA after undergoing EBUS-TBNA at our center, between July 2013 till July 2018 (total five years). The diagnostic yield, sensitivity and specificity of cytopathological and microbiological investigations (including TB culture and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Gene Xpert assay) for diagnosis of MTBLA were determined. ResultsOf the total 493 cancer patients, MTBLA was diagnosed in 54 (11%), with mean age of 48 ± 12 years, and predominantly male gender (59.3%). Thirty-three (61.1%) patients were clinically asymptomatic at the time of presentation, while cough was reported by 13 (24.7%) patients and weight loss, shortness of breath and fever by only six (11.1%), six (11.1%) and five (9.2%) patients, respectively. Total 53% had an underlying gastrointestinal malignancy. Chest imaging revealed bilateral versus unilateral hilar lymph node enlargement in 32 (59.3%) against 22 (40.7%) patients, respectively, while only 14 (25.9%) had accompanying lung parenchymal findings. Granulomatous TBNA cytology was detected in 41 (77.3%) patients, giving a diagnostic yield of 70.3% for MTBLA, with an estimated sensitivity and specificity of 79.2% and 99%, respectively. TB culture and Gene Xpert had a respective sensitivity of 48% and 53%, with the combined diagnostic yield of 64.8%. Treatment response was achieved in 51 (94%) patients, based on which EBUS was estimated to have sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 99% respectively, with no reported complications. ConclusionMediastinal TB can have diverse manifestations among cancer patients and can often be clinically occult, with overlapping radiological impressions. EBUS-TBNA can serve as a safe and reliable diagnostic tool in this regard.
CONTEXT: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common comorbid condition in advanced malignancies with variable survival. AIMS: The aim of this study was to predict the survival in patients with MPE undergoing indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients with MPE who underwent IPC insertion from January 2011 to December 2019 were reviewed. Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine the overall survival (OS) of the patient's cohort with respect to LENT score. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The IBM SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 110 patients who underwent IPC insertion for MPE, with a mean age of 49 ± 15 years. 76 (69.1%) patients were females, of which majority 59 (53.6%) had a primary diagnosis of breast cancer. The LENT score was used for risk stratification, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to predict the OS. The proportion of patients with low-risk LENT score had 91%, 58%, and 29% survival, the moderate-risk group had 76%, 52%, and 14% survival, and in the high-risk group, 61%, 15%, and 0% patients survived at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. In addition, there was a statistically significant survival difference ( P = 0.05) in patients who received chemotherapy pre- and post-IPC insertion. CONCLUSIONS: LENT score seems to be an easy and attainable tool, capable of predicting the survival of the patients with MPE quite accurately. It can be helpful in palliating the symptoms of patients with advanced malignancies by modifying the treatment strategies.
BackgroundCancer patients are considered as highly vulnerable individuals in the current COVID-19 pandemic. We studied the clinical characteristics of survivor and non-survivor COVID-19-infected cancer patients in Pakistan.Patients and MethodsWe did a retrospective study of 70 cancer patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection from Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore and Peshawar, Pakistan between April 13 and July 09, 2020. These patients were discharged from the hospital or had died by July 09, 2020. Clinical, pathological and radiological characteristics were compared between survivors and non-survivors by fisher’s exact test and chi-square test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to explore the risk factors of mortality.ResultsSeventy cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled and the majority were males 38 (54.3%). 57 (81.4%) had solid tumors and 13 (18.6%) had hematological malignancies. Dyspnea (44 cases) was the most common symptom (62.9%). Complications were reported in 51 (72.9%) patients during the course of disease. 19 (27.1%) patients were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). A significant increase in the C-reactive protein level and neutrophil count was observed in the deceased patients as compared to the surviving patients. D-dimer values of ≥0.2 mg/L were significantly associated with mortality (P=0.01). We identified two independent risk factors associated with death, ICU admission (P=0.007) and D-dimer (P=0.003).ConclusionPakistani cancer patients with COVID-19 infection reported poor prognosis. Intensive surveillance of clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients infected with COVID-19 especially D-dimer values may play a pivotal role in the outcome of the disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.