Foreign Direct investment (FDI) is considered to be an important source of capital especially in developing countries. FDI supplements local savings and brings a series of benefits in host countries. This research has focused OIC on countries since these countries are still far behind in attracting FDI compared to other developing countries. OIC member countries inhibit diversity in their resources from resource rich to resource poor countries. They lack behind the developed world in terms of economic development pertaining to weak economies. Since for these types of countries FDI can prove to be a vital source of capital, it becomes important to study the factors that affect it. This study exactly does the same by incorporating a series of determinants (inflation, size of the economy, trade openness, infrastructure, and institutional quality) to assess the impact they have in attracting FDI. We have used data for 42 countries spanning over 1996-2013. The choice of data selection has been dictated by data availability. For estimation we have used panel fixed effects and random effects estimators. Our results indicate that size of economy, infrastructure and trade openness are positively and significantly related in attracting FDI in those countries. Institutions on the other hand are negatively related. The effects of inflation are somewhat mixed according to our estimation and not robust. The implications of our findings are that policy makers should expend efforts in making more trade oriented policies, improve infrastructure and increase the size of economy.
We examine the impact of competition and portfolio diversification on banking stability for conventional and Islamic banks in Indonesia. We find that the Islamic banking sector is less stable, when compared to the conventional banking sector. Competition in the banking sector reduces stability, while diversification enhances it. We find that competition negatively impacts the Islamic banks, but diversification has no impact on these banks. An interesting finding is that competition and diversification complement each other in enhancing the stability of the Indonesian banking sector. These findings carry an important policy implication for the banking sector of Indonesia.
Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Citation informationCite this article as: Does supportive supervisor complements the effect of ethical leadership on employee engagement?,
The use of the traditional system is declined greatly and with a modernization of
the accounting and finance process there have been a great deal of change, and
these improvements are beneficial to the accounting and finance industry.
Adopting Artificial Intelligence applications such as Expert systems for audit and
tax, Intelligent Agents for customer service, Machine Learning for decision
making, etc. can lead a great benefit by reducing errors and increasing the
efficiency of the accounting and finance processes. To keep ensuring a
transparent and replicable process, we have conducted a meta-analysis. The
database search was between the years 1989-2020 and reviewed 150 research
papers. As meta-analysis results show, the majority of researches illustrate a
positive effect of the impact of AI systems in the accounting and finance process.
Key points:
Meta-Analysis has been applied for emphasizing positive results of the
impact of Artificial Intelligence systems in the Accounting and Finance
process.
Implementing Artificial Intelligence systems in Accounting and Finance
process can increase the efficiency of the process.
Artificial Intelligence technology has been influential in all the areas of
accounting, which are especially concerned with knowledge
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.