Multigranulation rough set (MGRS) based on soft relations is a very useful technique to describe the objectives of problem solving. This MGRS over two universes provides the combination of multiple granulation knowledge in a multigranulation space. This paper extends the concept of fuzzy set Shabir and Jamal in terms of an intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) based on multi-soft binary relations. This paper presents the multigranulation roughness of an IFS based on two soft relations over two universes with respect to the aftersets and foresets. As a result, two sets of IF soft sets with respect to the aftersets and foresets are obtained. These resulting sets are called lower approximations and upper approximations with respect to the aftersets and with respect to the foresets. Some properties of this model are studied. In a similar way, we approximate an IFS based on multi-soft relations and discuss their some algebraic properties. Finally, a decision-making algorithm has been presented with a suitable example.
Qian presented multigranulation rough set (MGRS) models based on Pawlak’s rough set (RS) model. There are two types of MGRS models, named optimistic MGRS and pessimistic MGRS. Recently, Shabir et al. presented an optimistic multigranulation intuitionistic fuzzy rough set (OMGIFRS) based on soft binary relations. This paper explores the pessimistic multigranulation intuitionistic fuzzy rough set (PMGIFRS) based on soft relations combined with a soft set (SS) over two universes. The resulting two sets are lower approximations and upper approximations with respect to the aftersets and foresets. Some basic properties of this established model are studied. Similarly, the MGRS of an IFS based on multiple soft relations is presented and some algebraic properties are discussed. Finally, an example is presented that illustrates the importance of the proposed decision-making algorithm.
The basic notions in rough set theory are lower and upper approximation operators defined by a fixed binary relation. This paper proposes an intuitionistic fuzzy rough set (IFRS) model which is a combination of intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) and rough set. We approximate an IFS by using soft binary relations instead of fixed binary relations. By using this technique, we get two pairs of intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) soft sets, called the upper approximation and lower approximation with respect to foresets and aftersets. Properties of newly defined rough set model (IFRS) are studied. Similarity relations between IFS with respect to this rough set model (IFRS) are also studied. Finally, an algorithm is constructed depending on these approximations of IFSs and score function for decision-making problems, although a method of decision-making algorithm has been introduced for fuzzy sets already. But, this new IFRS model is more accurate to solve the problem because IFS has degree of nonmembership and degree of hesitant.
The major advantage of this proposed work is to investigate roughness of intuitionistic fuzzy subsemigroups (RIFSs) by using soft relations. In this way, two sets of intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) soft subsemigroups, named lower approximation and upper approximation regarding aftersets and foresets, have been introduced. In RIFSs, incomplete and insufficient information is handled in decision-making problems like symptom diagnosis in medical science. In addition, this new technique is more effective as compared to the previous literature because we use intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) instead of fuzzy set (FS). Since the FS describes the membership degree only but often in real-world problems, we need the description of nonmembership degree. That is why an IFS is a more useful set due to its nonmembership degree and hesitation degree. The above technique is applied for left (right) ideals, interior ideals, and bi-ideals in the same manner as described for subsemigroups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.