Anatomy has become one of the most fundamental knowledge in a medical education program and it's comprehensions are significantly important to understand another branch of clinical knowledge. General anatomy textbook or it's fancy as RAUL (Rangkuman Anatomi Umum Lengkap), arguably, got to be the main source of anatomy learning in the Faculty of Medicine, still need some evaluations. This research aim is to evaluate the eligibility of the fourth edition of the general anatomy textbook in chapter three. This study encompasses qualitative analysis which depends on its book. One technique that is being used in this research is qualitative analysis approaches with a mutually-related interactive model. The content eligibility was analyzed in depth with theory and particular data based instrument which come from various sources. The feasibility of content was assessed in terms of the suitability of the material description with KI and KD, the accuracy of the material, and supporting learning material. Given data was analyzed inductively with collected data, data reduction, data arrangement, data withdrawal, and verification of conclusion. Judging from data analysis, it can be concluded that the content of general anatomy textbook "RAUL", fourth edition, chapter three, Faculty of Medicine Sebelas Maret University, is very feasible with the value of 95% according to twelve points of the assessment aspects. It is hoped that this research can become a reference in evaluating the following textbook and contribute for anatomy learning as well.

Background: Brain tumor is a disease that is difficult to treat and causes high morbidity and mortality. One of the clinical manifestations of brain tumors is cognitive impairment which is the most common neurological problem. The aim of this study is to determine the profile of cognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors. Subjects and Method: The design of this study was a retrospective cross-sectional using secondary data from the Neurology Polyclinic of RSUD Dr. Moewardi in January 2021-March 2022. The subject was diagnosed with a brain tumor based on anamnesis, physical examination, and neuroimaging. Cognitive impairment was inferred through the MoCA-Ina test. The analysis used was univariate descriptive analysis, independent T test, Mann-Whitney test, and Pearson correlation test. Results: There were 29 subjects with a mean MoCA-Ina score (17.97). Primary brain tumors (79.3%), more than metastatic tumors. The majority of patients were diagnosed with meningioma (55.2%). This study showed that there were differences in abstraction scores (p=0.015) and total MoCA-Ina scores (p=0.042) between patients with tumors located in the temporal lobe and nontemporal lobe; differences in abstraction scores (p=0.034) and orientation scores (p=0.042) between patients with supratentorial and infratentorial tumors; and differences in memory scores (p=0.028) between patients with and without radiation history. In addition, this study also found an association between the number of lobes affected by brain tumors with attention score (p=0.027; r=-0.409), abstraction score (p=0.004; r=-0.524), orientation score (p=0.021; r=-0.426), and the total score of MoCA-Ina (p=0.018, r=-0.435). Conclusion:There is an association between brain tumors and cognitive impairment which is concluded through the MoCA-Ina test. The clinical manifestations of cognitive impairment in the patient are in accordance with the neuroanatomical function of the brain affected by the lesion.