ABSTRAKEvaluasi yang dilakukan terhadap kegiatan wirausaha muda masih terdapat beberapa kelemahan kelompok seperti ide yang ditampilkan merupakan ide tahun sebelumnya, penyusunan proposal belum sesuai, belum ada strategi pemasaran, dan teknik presentasi yang kaku. Pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berwirausaha sehingga dapat menjadi bekal Ketika lulus pendidikan. Metode pendampingan dilakukan dengan ceramah, diskusi, dan tanya jawab serta proses coaching kepada tiga kelompok wirausaha taruna dan satu wirausaha alumni. Hasil pendampingan dengan metode CPDT dan coaching meningkatnya kreativitas kelompok wirausaha, proposal bisnis sesuai pedoman, dan kelompok mampu melakukan presentasi lebih menarik dan efektif. Kata kunci: wirausaha muda; pendampingan; ceramah; diskusi dan penugasan; coaching. ABSTRACTThe evaluation carried out on young entrepreneurial activities still has several weaknesses in the group, such as the ideas presented in the previous year, inadequate proposal preparation, no marketing strategy, and rigid presentation techniques. This community service aims to improve entrepreneurial skills so that they can become provisions when graduating from education. The mentoring method is carried out by lectures, discussions, and questions and answers as well as a coaching process to three youth entrepreneur groups and one alumni entrepreneur. The results of assistance with the CPDT method and coaching increased the creativity of entrepreneurial groups, business proposals according to guidelines, and groups were able to make more attractive and effective presentations. Keywords: young entrepreneurs; accompaniment; lectures, discussions and assignments; coaching.

Rural-urban social inequality is a problem that must be solved to achieve prosperity and economic justice that is desired by all human beings. Efforts to overcome the problem are to create and carry out the Program of Marine and Fisheries Innovation Village which is a program of marine and fisheries community empowerment to be able to take advantage of technology and innovation as an effort to improve their lives. Limited budget and resources cause not all villages that are partners in community service at the Sorong Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic can be turned into Marine and Fisheries Innovation Villages. This research was conducted to determine the priority ranking of villages to be selected and to carry out innovation and technology interventions according to the predetermined criteria. Decision making in this marine and fisheries innovation village requires a systematic and accurate method using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In the case study, the selection of the innovation village program was carried out at three locations in the Sorong area (Walal Village, Rimbapala Village, and Pulau Raam Village). The criteria used in the selection of alternative innovation villages were: 1) having local government support, 2) community response, 3) having superior fishery commodities, 4) accessibility, and 5) in accordance with the resources owned by the KP Sorong Polytechnic. The results obtained based on the AHP method were Raam Island 58,7%, Walal 21,9%, and Rimbapala 19,4%. The conclusion is that the village selected as the innovation village is Raam Island with the highest score of 58,7%.   Keywords: alternatives, analytical hierarchy process, criteria, innovation village, options