Background-Airway wall thickening has been observed in post mortem studies of patients with asthma. Assessment of airway wall thickening by high resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) scanning has been reported in experimental studies. We have used HRCT scanning to measure airway wall thickness at the segmental and subsegmental levels in 40 patients with asthma and 14 normal controls. Methods-The subjects were prospectively divided into four age and sex matched groups: 14 patients with a history of near fatal attack of asthma (NFA; group 1), 12 patients with moderate asthma (group 2), 13 patients with mild asthma (group 3), and 14 normal controls (group 4). All subjects were non-smokers. High resolution (1 mm collimation) CT scans of the chest were done at five diVerent levels. Results-The mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) was 68 (20)% of predicted for group 1, 73 (12)% for group 2, 102 (12)% for group 3, and 103 (12)% for group 4. The ratio of airway wall thickness to outer diameter (T/D) and the percentage wall area (WA%) defined as (wall area/total airway area) × 100 were used to compare airway wall thickness between the groups. The mean (SD) T/D and WA% were 0.27 (0.05) and 78.0 (9.2)% for group 1, 0.27 (0.05) and 78.8 (9.2)% for group 2, 0.25 (0.04) and 74.2 (7.5)% for group 3, and 0.23 (0.04) and 70.9 (8.2)% for group 4. T/D and WA% were not significantly diVerent between groups 1 and 2. However, both groups 1 and 2 had higher T/D and WA% than either group 3 or 4 (p < 0.001) and group 3 had a higher T/D and WA% than group 4 (p < 0.03).The diVerences (95% CI) between the groups in WA% were 7.1% (0 to 14.4) for groups 1 and 4, 3.8% (-3.4 to 10) for groups 1 and 3, and 3.3% (-4.4 to 10) for groups 3 and 4. The diVerences between the groups in T/D and WA% were noted both for those with airways with a luminal diameter of >2 mm and those with a luminal diameter of <2 mm. Conclusions-All the patient groups had greater airway wall thickening than the normal subjects as assessed by HRCT scanning, but patients with more severe asthma had greater airway wall thickening than those with mild asthma. The methodology described in this study may be useful in assessing airway calibre in early intervention studies with antiinflammatory therapy. (Thorax 1998;53:248-253)

Computed tomography (CT) was compared with chest radiography in the assessment of disease severity in 27 patients with sarcoidosis. The CT scans and radiographs were each read twice by two independent observers. Disease extent was assessed on CT scans by visual scoring (0%-100% involvement of the lung parenchyma) and on radiographs by using an adaptation of the International Labour Office classification. The severity of parenchymal changes on the CT scan and on the radiograph was significantly correlated with the severity of dyspnea (r = .61 and .58, respectively; P less than .001), diffusing capacity (r = -.62 and -.52, P less than .01), and vital capacity (r = -.49 and -.51, P less than .01). Patients with predominantly irregular opacities had more severe dyspnea and lower lung volumes than patients with predominantly nodular opacities (P less than .05). The authors conclude that in patients with sarcoidosis, the radiographic and CT assessments of disease severity show similar correlation with clinical and functional impairment.

The aims of this paper are to summarize the current recommendations for the use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the chest and to suggest some possible future developments.The main developments of CT in the chest have been the introduction of highresolution CT (HRCT), spiral CT and, more recently, multidetector spiral CT.HRCT is defined as thin-section CT (1-to 2-mm collimation scans), optimized by using a high-spatial resolution (edge-enhancing) algorithm. Several studies have shown that HRCT closely reflects macroscopic (gross) pathological findings. HRCT currently has the best sensitivity and specificity of any imaging method used for the assessment of focal and diffuse lung diseases.The advent of spiral CT and, more recently, multidetector CT scanners, has allowed for major improvements in the imaging of airways, pulmonary and systemic vessels, and lung nodules. Spiral CT facilitates multiplanar and three-dimensional display of structures and visualization of pulmonary and systemic vessels, with a level of detail that is comparable to that of conventional angiography. With the use of graphics-based software programs, spiral CT enables depiction of the luminal surface of the airways with images that resemble those of bronchoscopy (virtual bronchoscopy) or bronchography (virtual bronchography). Several studies have shown a high sensitivity and specificity for spiral CT in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Therefore, spiral CT is rapidly becoming the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.Like the radiograph, signal intensity on computed tomography is mainly due to a single parameter: electron density. The signal intensity of the magnetic resonance image depends on four parameters: nuclear density, two relaxation times called T1 and T2, and motion of the nuclei within the imaged lung volume. Abnormal soft tissue can be identified more easily through measurement of these four parameters than through use of computed tomography. Furthermore, because the spatial orientation of the image is determined by manipulation of magnetic fields, scans can be performed in any plane. The main indications for magnetic resonance in the chest have been in the evaluation of the heart, major vessels, mediastinum, and hilar structures because of the natural contrast provided by flowing blood. Of particular interest for the respirologist has been the recent development of magnetic resonance angiography. This technique consists of three-dimensional single breath-hold images obtained using gadolinium-based contrast agents. This is a promising technique for the diagnosis of acute and chronic pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2002; 19: Suppl. 35, 3s- For many years, the plain chest radiograph was the only imaging modality used in the diagnosis of lung disease. With the advent of computed tomography (CT) came the first opportunity to assess gross lung structure. Conventional 8-to 10-mm collimation scans allowed better assessment of the lung parenchyma than was...

No abstract