Background 20–80% of adults presenting to a dental clinic experience anxiety. Negative past dental experiences and environmental factors such as the waiting area of a dental clinic or sound of a drill are commonly considered triggering factors for anxiety. Anxiety management strategies are considered a part of routine dental procedure, due to increased prevalence and compromised patient care. Hence the aim of the present study is to identify the prevalence and variables associated with dental anxiety and their management in patients visiting the primary care dental clinics in Bahrain. Method Four hundred and eighty participants were included. A 3-part questionnaire deciphered the demographic characteristics of the participants, the dental procedure undertaken, the level of anxiety, and the management strategy used by the dentist. The pre and post-treatment MDAS scores were recorded. Paired t test, ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test the level of significance between the variables and the mean MDAS scores. The p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The prevalence of dental anxiety was 23.7% with moderate anxiety, and 11.4% with high anxiety. Females presented with a higher mean MDAS both pre and post-treatment compared with males. A statistically significant difference between the pre and post-treatment MDAS scores were observed in educated patients less than 50 years of age. Those with unpleasant previous dental experience showed statistically significant difference. Analyses of anxiety management techniques showed that single techniques worked better than combination techniques. Rest and breaks combined with any other technique of choice showed significant reduction in the MDAS scores post treatment. Conclusion To conclude, all patients attending the dental clinic present with some level of anxiety that necessitates the dentist to use anxiety management strategies. Non-pharmacological methods that are non-invasive must be the first choice. Rests and breaks, with any technique of choice provides the best possible anxiety management. It is possible to achieve the desired anxiety reduction in single visit to complete the planned dental intervention, other than in patients who are dental phobic.

Background: Local anesthetics alone or in combination with adjuncts, such as oral medications, have routinely been used for pain control during endodontic treatment. The best clinical choice amongst the vast numbers of agents and techniques available for pain control for irreversible pulpitis is unclear. This network meta-analysis combined the available evidence on agents and techniques for pulpal anesthesia in the maxilla and mandible, in order to identify the best amongst these approaches statistically, as a basis for future clinical trials. Methods: Randomized trials in MEDLINE, DARE, and COCHRANE databases were screened based on inclusion criteria and data were extracted. Heterogeneity was assessed and odds ratios were used to estimate effects. Inconsistencies between direct and indirect pooled estimates were evaluated by H-statistics. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group approach was used to assess evidence quality. Results: Sixty-two studies (nine studies in the maxilla and 53 studies in the mandible) were included in the meta-analysis. Increased mandibular pulpal anesthesia success was observed on premedication with aceclofenac + paracetamol or supplemental 4% articaine buccal infiltration or ibuprofen+paracetamol premedication, all the above mentioned with 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). No significant difference was noted for any of the agents investigated in terms of the success rate of maxillary pulpal anesthesia. Conclusion: Direct and indirect comparisons indicated that some combinations of IANB with premedication and/or supplemental infiltration had a greater chance of producing successful mandibular pulpal anesthesia. No ideal technique for maxillary anesthesia emerged. Randomized clinical trials with increased sample size may be needed to provide more conclusive data. Our findings suggest that further high-quality studies are required in order to provide definitive direction to clinicians regarding the best agents and techniques to use for mandibular and maxillary anesthesia for irreversible pulpitis.

Background Digital impression techniques have seen many advancements, with new hardware and software being developed each year. The technical advantages of these systems are real‐time visualization, evaluation and archive, segmental capture, ease of recapture if necessary, economical in terms of no use of impression material or trays or disinfection, easy file transfer and communication with the laboratory. However patient satisfaction is one major factor that might influence the choice of impression technique. The aim of this network meta‐analysis was to identify statistically the evidence on overall patient preferences relative to digital versus conventional impression techniques, in addition to the time taken in making these impressions. Methodology Randomized or prospective clinical studies were identified based on the inclusion criteria in PUBMED, DARE and COCHRANE databases; subsequently pertinent data were extracted. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity amongst the studies in direct comparison was assessed by Chi‐square and I2 tests using the Inverse variance heterogeneity model. Direct comparison estimates were derived by pooling the data from studies that compared the same intervention. Indirect comparison pooled estimates were derived by using the data amongst the studies, through a common comparator, using MetaXL software. Mean differences and Odds ratio at 95% confidence interval were used as the effect estimates, while inconsistencies were evaluated by H‐statistics. GRADE working group approach was used to assess the quality of available evidence. Results Fourteen studies were included. Results from 11 studies  on 471 patients (236‐Digital; 235‐conventional) were pooled for patient preference with 95% confidence interval. The Forest plot showed a pooled estimate of 31.23 [5.95, 163.87], showing a statistically significant number of patients favouring digital impressions. Results from 11 studies reported the time taken in 589 patients (278‐digital; 311 conventional). The pooled estimate (2.72 [0.08, 5.32]) (95% confidence interval) showed a statistically significant increase in the time required to make digital impressions. The overall time taken in minutes for the interventions in the digital group in decreasing order were: LAVA Cos (8.14[3.64,12,26] (statistically significant); I tero (4.11[‐1.02,9.24]; CEREC (0.34[‐4.14,4.82]). Conclusion There was an overall preference for digital impressions, although the time required is longer. The factors related to the digital system, the operator and the patient were studied, with recommendations forming a basis for possible hardware and software upgrades of the digital systems that can produce significant improvement in the acceptance rate for both the patient and the clinician.

Background: Orthodontic patients are at greater risk due to the inability to clean around the components directly bonded to teeth. Hence, the aim of the present network meta-analysis is to compare the utility of powered toothbrushes in plaque control in patients with orthodontic brackets compared with manual tooth brushing. Methodology: Necessary data were extracted and analysed for Risk of Bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi-square and I 2 tests. Random effects model was used for both direct and mixed treatment comparisons. Standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval was the effect estimate for plaque and bleeding scores and mean difference for pocket depth. Inconsistencies between the direct and indirect estimates were evaluated by H-statistics. GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Pooled results from 14 studies showed significantly higher plaque scores in patients using manual toothbrushes. Pooled results from 13 studies showed significant higher bleeding scores as well with manual brushes. There was a significant reduction in pocket depth with electric toothbrushes. Conclusion: Powered toothbrushes are a promising alternative for plaque control in patients with fixed orthodontic brackets. Stronger evidence can be established with addition of long-term clinical trials based on the recommendations.

Objectives: Healthcare-related information sharing via social media is on the rise following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Dental practices primarily use social media to search, share, and communicate health-related information. Considering the increasing trend of using social media, the primary aim of the present study was to identify the use of social media by dentists and laypeople to post and view dentistry-related content in Bahrain.Methods: This questionnaire-based cross-sectional study included adult participants and dentists. A pretested validated questionnaire was administered. The chi-square test for association was used to assess the association between categorical outcomes. A <i>p</i>-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: In total, 249 adult participants and 53 dentists were included. A substantial majority (83.5%) of the participants reported that they always used social media to view dentistry-related content, and 69.8% of the dentists felt that patients who use social media have better oral health awareness. A longer duration of social media usage showed significant associations with particularly viewing dentistry-related content (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and contacting dentists directly through social media for consultation (<i>p</i> = 0.055).Conclusions: An extremely high percentage of the younger population in Bahrain is using various social media to discuss dentistry. This engagement should be wisely managed to promote dentistry-related information sharing, which can lead to increased awareness related to overall dental health. There is a definite need to enforce certain standard operating procedures in every country that will prevent the misuse of this technological advancement.